I need some help/insight for this question, about 150 words.
In the study of the origins of knowledge, belief and the nature of learning "Why not settle for Psychology" (Quine, 1969: 75). Should neuroscience replace epistemology?
W.V. Quine (1969) Ontological Relativity and Other Essays NY: ColumbiaUniversity Press© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com July 16, 2018, 10:25 pm ad1c9bdddf
Hi. I hope this solution gets to you in time. I would have answered earlier but my PC has been preoccupied with software issues. The solution below should get you started. If you have any questions, just let me know via the feedback section.
OTA 105878/Xenia Jones
Neuroscience vs. Epistemology
In Quine (1969), we find a debate about the emic and etic nature of the exploration of knowledge and cognition. To study psychology is to delve into cognition from a socio-psychological perspective while to study the human mind via the neuroscience pathway is to go into ...
The solution discusses the question - 'Should neuroscience replace epistemology?' as proposed in the work of Quine (see above). References are listed for further exploration of the topic. A word version is also attached.