Mathematics - Proof of Midpoint Theorem using Vectors

Related BrainMass Solutions

• Synthetic and analytical proof: parrallelogram

  Prove the theorem given above in Euclidean geometry using analytic techniques. 1. Include each step of your proof. 2. Provide written justification for each step of your proof.

• deriving the distance formula

  257581 Centroid theorem proof and deriving the distance formula Prove the CENTROID therorem using the VECTOR proof as well as the SYNTHETIC proof Explain how to derive the distance formula (assuming that the distance formula is not yet known), first

• Geometric proofs using right angles

  553266 Geometric proofs using right angles Need to write a proof for the following: Given: BAC is a right angle DEC is a right angle line DB bisects line AE Prove: C is the midpoint of line DB.

• Mean value theorem proof

  This is a proof regarding the mean value theorem.

• Linear Algebra - Four Fundamental Subspaces

  Proof: (a) For any , we have , then . On the other hand, if , then . We note that is actually a linear combination of the column vectors of . Here is a simple explanation.

• Linear Algebra: Basis and Dimension

  I suppose that you could also do a more round-about proof using 2 or 3 of the theorems, but I think the simpler proof is good enough.

• Gerhard Gentzen

  In the case of classical logic, Gentzen proved his sharpened Hauptsatz, that a proof can be divided into a propositional part and a quantification part (with the "midsequent" in the middle). This result is similar to Herbrand's theorem [1930].

• Summation and series

  (Required) Without using Theorem 4.2.2, use mathematical induction to prove that P(n): 2 + 4 + 6 + ...+ 2n = n2 + n for all integers n  1. 7.

• Synthetic, Analytic and Vector Techniques in Euclidean Geometry

  We can prove Pytahgoras theorem using the various techniques of Euclidean geometry.

• Discrete structures and logical equivalences

  give a direct proof of the theorem. Q3) consider the following theorem " The sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. What is the hypothesis of the theorem? what is the conclusion?