Explore BrainMass

Poincare's Lemma and its Converse

Not what you're looking for? Search our solutions OR ask your own Custom question.

This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Please see the attached file for the fully formatted problem.

For  phi E C2[R3 ! R3], curl grad phi = 0. Prove this. The converse is "Poincare's Lemma": if f E C1[R3 --> R3] and if curl f = 0, then f is a gradient, i.e., f = grad  for some  2 C2. Try it this way: if f = grad phi, then

phi (x1, x2, x3) = phi(0)+ ....

See why? Be that as it may, this function phi is perfectly well - defined. So start from scratch with this phi taken out of the air and see what it's gradient is, assuming curl f = 0.

https://brainmass.com/math/complex-analysis/poincares-lemma-converse-15636

Solution Preview

Please see the attached file for the complete solution.
Thanks for using BrainMass.

For . If , then f is a gradient, ie., for some .

Proof. (1) We will prove " If then "
Let . ...

Solution Summary

A gradient is found using Poincare's Lemma. The solution is detailed and well presented.

\$2.49