Purchase Solution

Ethical Leadership in Criminal Justice

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

I need help with the following. The information needed is pertaining to the case study (The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots). Introduce the case study and give a brief overview of the study. Why do you think this case is important to the understanding of leadership? What do you think the difference is between a manager and a leader?
Be sure to include the following critical elements and cited references for each source used:
A. Analyze the actions of leadership in the study for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem. Be sure to provide examples from the study to support your response. What instances in the study exemplify the approach of leadership in encouraging and interacting with employees?
B. Analyze the actions of leadership in the study for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem. Be sure to provide examples from the study to support your response. What communication issues might leadership face when addressing this problem? What are the implications or consequences of these issues?
C. Determine whether the supervisors in the study have functioned as effective leaders. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response.

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

The ethical leadership in criminal justice is examined.

Solution Preview

I need help with the following. The information needed is pertaining to the case study (The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots). Introduce the case study and give a brief overview of the study. Why do you think this case is important to the understanding of leadership? What do you think the difference is between a manager and a leader?

The case study examines the fallacies and mistakes made by leaders during the build up to the L.A. riots as well as during the riots themselves. The study focuses on the rivalries that existed between the L.A.P.D. and the Sheriff's department wherein both leaders of these departments were egotistical and distrustful of the other department, which led to a crucial lack of cooperation and communication. The study also focuses on the fact that neither the mayor or the police brass and administration thought that the cops would be totally acquitted, which resulted in them not planning for the type of response to such a verdict. The verdict, which was a worst case scenario, literally caught those in charge of handling any uprising as a result of the verdict off guard.
Be sure to include the following critical elements and cited references for each source ...

Solution provided by:
Education
  • Associates of Arts , Lone Star Community College
  • Bachelor of Science , Sam Houston State University
  • Masters of Science, Kaplan University
  • Masters of Science , Kaplan University
Recent Feedback
  • "Thank you however I have two questions: 1.) where in this passage is the actual problem statement? 2.) if you used references can you please provide them? This is great work and I am so grateful. "
  • "Thank you very much"
  • "excellent analysis"
  • "graet job very helpful"
  • "Thank you, excellent and very detailed."
Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!