Ethical Leadership in Criminal Justice
I need help with the following. The information needed is pertaining to the case study (The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots). Introduce the case study and give a brief overview of the study. Why do you think this case is important to the understanding of leadership? What do you think the difference is between a manager and a leader?
Be sure to include the following critical elements and cited references for each source used:
A. Analyze the actions of leadership in the study for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem. Be sure to provide examples from the study to support your response. What instances in the study exemplify the approach of leadership in encouraging and interacting with employees?
B. Analyze the actions of leadership in the study for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem. Be sure to provide examples from the study to support your response. What communication issues might leadership face when addressing this problem? What are the implications or consequences of these issues?
C. Determine whether the supervisors in the study have functioned as effective leaders. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response.
https://brainmass.com/law/ethics-human-rights/ethical-leadership-criminal-justice-622458
Solution Preview
I need help with the following. The information needed is pertaining to the case study (The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots). Introduce the case study and give a brief overview of the study. Why do you think this case is important to the understanding of leadership? What do you think the difference is between a manager and a leader?
The case study examines the fallacies and mistakes made by leaders during the build up to the L.A. riots as well as during the riots themselves. The study focuses on the rivalries that existed between the L.A.P.D. and the Sheriff's department wherein both leaders of these departments were egotistical and distrustful of the other department, which led to a crucial lack of cooperation and communication. The study also focuses on the fact that neither the mayor or the police brass and administration thought that the cops would be totally acquitted, which resulted in them not planning for the type of response to such a verdict. The verdict, which was a worst case scenario, literally caught those in charge of handling any uprising as a result of the verdict off guard.
Be sure to include the following critical elements and cited references for each source ...
Solution Summary
The ethical leadership in criminal justice is examined.