Purchase Solution

Law and Evidence

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Explain the differences between the three types of evidence and provide a typical example of each.

Find examples of evidence that were controversial (e.g., DNA testing). State what the evidence was, what type of evidence it would be considered, and whether or not the evidence was admitted.

Do you feel it should have been admitted? Why or why not? Support your answer with evidence.

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

Explains the differences between the three types of evidence and provides a typical example of each. Controversial examples of evidence (e.g., DNA testing) are also examined, including if the evidence was admitted, and if it should have been admitted. Evidence supported.

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Criminal Defenses Review

Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.

Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Identifying Evidence-based Policing

    In closing, evidence based policing has split the law enforcement field down the middle as it relates to supporters and opposes.

  • Use of Evidence: Inventory Search

    Through the 'plain view' & at times, the 'open fields doctrine', the police creating an inventory of an impounded vehicle or a vehicle retained for legal/law enforcement purpose come across evidence suggesting criminal activity and as law enforcement

  • DNA in Law Enforcement

    The use of DNA evidence has saved law enforcement agencies time, money, and resources as this evidence can limit the unnecessary chasing of phantom suspects and wrong leads.

  • Forensic accountant's role in evidence collection

    Should evidence collection and preservation be left only for law enforcement professionals? The forensic accountant should play an important role in collecting evidence.

  • US criminal justice system key elements in relation with a c

    In the United States the main categories of laws under the common law system are criminal law, civil law (tort), and administrative/regulatory law.

  • Computer Forensics: Damage to Evidence and Consequences

    In order for evidence to be admissible court of law, precautions have to be taken while collecting and analyzing evidence. Most law enforcement departments use a set of criterion when collecting evidence from a cyber crime.

  • Procedure For Securing Digital Evidence

    Law enforcement has had to revise policies and procedures in the collection and securing this digital evidence as well. Below we'll discuss the procedure for securing digital evidence and some of the concern of the investigators during the process.

  • Passport and Justice

    Finally, address the four major legal systems in the world: Civil law, socialist law, Islamic law, and common law.

  • Arguing The Exclusionary Rule

    It is frustrating at times for law enforcement officers if they 'know' and can easily ascertain 'guilt' in most cases where only acceptable evidence can cause conviction.

  • Explanation of Reasonable Expecatation of Privacy.

    Law Enforcement and security personnel must quote Miranda rights (REP) before arresting a perceived criminal or all evidence collected will not be admissible in a court of law and the individual who committed the crime will not be punished.

View More Related Solutions