Lindholm V. Brant Case Assessment
Not what you're looking for?
What are the details of the Lindholm V. Brant case?
Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary
The details of the Lindholm V. Brant Case is examined.
Solution Preview
Lindholm v. Brant, 283 Conn. 65 (2006) 925 A.2d 1048, was decided under Conn. Gen. Stat § 42a-2-403. In this case, the court held that even though the defendant failed to verify his purchase of Red Elvis from Anders Malmberg with the plaintiff, who owned the painting, the defendant still rightfully took possession of it in the ordinary course of business.
To come to this conclusion, the court examined the facts and applied them to Conn. Gen. Stat § 42a-2-403. The relevant facts are that the Plaintiff originally owned a Warhol painting entitled Red Elvis. When the plaintiff purchased Red Elvis in 1987 from Malmberg, an art dealer, she received an invoice on his stationary. The plaintiff anonymously lent Red Elvis to the MOMA beginning in 1989. Though several museums intended to borrow the painting, the plaintiff only casually involved herself in arranging those loans. Malmberg was associated with and dealt with the painting publicly.
In 2000, the defendant negotiated with ...
Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Criminal Defenses Review
Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.
Title VII Laws
Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.
Contract Requirments
How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!
Constitutional Law Rights
How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!
Evidence
Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!