Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Lindholm V. Brant Case Assessment

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    What are the details of the Lindholm V. Brant case?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 4:35 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/law/business-law/lindholm-versus-brant-case-assessment-468041

    Solution Preview

    Lindholm v. Brant, 283 Conn. 65 (2006) 925 A.2d 1048, was decided under Conn. Gen. Stat § 42a-2-403. In this case, the court held that even though the defendant failed to verify his purchase of Red Elvis from Anders Malmberg with the plaintiff, who owned the painting, the defendant still rightfully took possession of it in the ordinary course of business.

    To come to this conclusion, the court examined the facts and applied them to Conn. Gen. Stat § 42a-2-403. The relevant facts are that the Plaintiff originally owned a Warhol painting entitled Red Elvis. When the plaintiff purchased Red Elvis in 1987 from Malmberg, an art dealer, she received an invoice on his stationary. The plaintiff anonymously lent Red Elvis to the MOMA beginning in 1989. Though several museums intended to borrow the painting, the plaintiff only casually involved herself in arranging those loans. Malmberg was associated with and dealt with the painting publicly.

    In 2000, the defendant negotiated with ...

    Solution Summary

    The details of the Lindholm V. Brant Case is examined.

    $2.19