Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Juvenile Detention: Top Down and Bottom Up Decisions

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    There are two approaches to goal setting—a top-down and a bottom-up approach. With which of the two approaches do you agree? Why?

    Is it possible to have a middle-of-the-road approach that is a combination of both approaches? Would a middle-of-the-road approach be beneficial? Why and how?

    Read the following case study from, Criminal Justice Policy and Planning by Wayne N. Welsh and Philip W. Harris:

    2-1: Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Goal Setting: Responding to Negative Information about Conditions of Juvenile Confinement
    With reference to the case study, answer the following questions:

    Was the original goal setting approach used in the case top-down or bottom-up? How?
    Why did Performance-based Standards (PbS) face resistance?
    How did PbS address the resistance faced?
    use references cite sources

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com May 20, 2020, 11:55 pm ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/history/world-history/juvenile-detention-top-down-and-bottom-up-decisions-599021

    Solution Summary

    This deals with a case study connecting decision theory with juvenile detention centers. the problem is that the nature of the state and its bureaucracy is inherently top-down. There is no mechanism in place for the opposite. hence, the question answers itself.

    $2.19

    ADVERTISEMENT