1-it should be only one page and comprised of two paragraphs. The first paragraph should be brief, no more than one fourth to one third of the page. It should quickly summarize the reading in a sentence or two and then present a short thesis statement which indicates what we are going to argue. In the second paragraph we should assess the reading critically.
2-Problems to avoid: Do not summarize the reading because that is not analysis. Avoid giving unsubstantiated personal opinions. An analysis requires a disciplined treatment of the evidence so that we can arrive at some understanding of the past; personal reactions refer to one's own personal assumptions and only tell us about ourselves, rather than the past. This is what historians call anachronism: the retrospective application of our values to the past.
Herodotus the first Historian
On his Work, the Histories
The Selection of readings were taken from the translated work of Herodotus, a narrative that sought to explain, share, tell and record what he experienced and saw in many of his travels as a scholar in much of the Ancient World, the world of Antiquity. Known as the first Historian, much have been made on the veracity of the methods applied by Herodotus and his 9-book 'Histories', a collection of select historical data from the known world of his time. While Thucydides is seen by many as an objective & chronologically-inclined ancient Historian in his work on the Peloponnesian War, Herodotus' focus was to create an understanding of the known world during the Hellenistic period through his travels, access to various libraries from Macedonia to Egypt and a systematic manner of information gathering whereby prior to inclusion he applied methods of verification to the veracity of his sources, particularly data from the most far flung of places or data from distant past. He arranged all these in a vivid narrative, allowing the reader of his 'Histories' a colourful reincarnation of the past through his writings. Herodotus was inclined in creating 'maps', ancient representations of the known world to situate the event in question geographically. Much of the ancient world that we know today we owe to the writings of Herodotus and much of the criticism of his work stems from the very nature of it: vivid, almost firsthand accounts of ancient society that are not chronologically placed. The vivid description merits an almost ethnographical messiness to the texts, that the layering of stories allows social scientists to create patterns on the manner of Herodotus' writings providing an insight to his take on the nature of human events. One can argue that his work when read seems like some travel annals of sorts - in the selected readings he takes us to Babylon & Mesopotamia, Egypt, Scythia, Phoenicia, parts of present day Turkey, Greek territories and territories in North Africa.
Like Thucydides, he provides particular speeches & documentaries when his sources allow it for political events. Unlike Thucydides though, while Herodotus' data collection was systematic, his histories allow for Hellenistic Myth influencing some of his recollections of events. A credit can be given though to the manner by which this myths surface --- they ...
The solution, attached as a 1,583-word essay discusses the philosophy, works and life of ancient Greek Historian Herodotus. The solution follows the APA format and lists references, both web and print for expansion.
History and Literature
Provide a brief summary of the relationship between history and literature by answering the following questions. What is the relationship between history and literature? Is one subordinate to the other? What can we learn, for example, (be specific)? Does knowledge of history make a story more powerful, more "real?" Does history create literature and, in turn, literature create history?View Full Posting Details