1) Edmund F. Byrne - author of the May, 2002 article entitled "Business ethics: A helpful hybrid in search of integrity." Published in in the Journal of Business Ethics, Volume #37, Issue #2. Article is found on pages 121-133.
2) Published in September 24, 2011 issue of The Economist. Article entitled "Business: The view from the top, and bottom; Corporate culture." Pages 76-77.
3) Article authored by Jonathan Dee entitled a "A Toy Maker's Conscience," and published in the New York Times Magazine. New York: Dec 23, 2007. p. 34 (6 pages).
4) Article entitled: "75 years of lessons learned: chief executive officer values and corporate social responsibility," authored by Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly, and published in the Journal of Management History in 2009. Volume 15, and Issue 1. p. 78
5) Article entitled "Corporation communication, ethics, and operational identity: a case study of Benetton." Was authored by Janet L Borgerson, Jonathan E Schroeder, Martin Escudero Magnusson, and Frank Magnusson. Found in a journal entitled "Business Ethics." Oxford: July, 2009. Volume #18, Issue #3; p. 209.
My school library is down and I'm unable to pull up the articles as assigned; please review and tell me whether or not the articles as provided could be used as valid references (Scholarly vs non Scholarly Sources) when writing a paper and why or why not. Just looking at them I'm going to assume they are, but my teacher begs to differ. Your help is greatly appreciated.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com August 18, 2018, 8:22 am ad1c9bdddf
Hi there! Thanks so much for letting me respond to your post and offer you the best I can. I hope you find the content of this response most helpful for engaging the subject and recognizing your questions and opinions are worth sharing!
It seems your professor clearly does want "scholarly sources," but beyond that it seems your professor also holds a high standard for what counts. So in some ways, I actually do agree with the ...
Scholarly versus non scholarly source are examined. Corporate cultures are discussed.