This learning activity tests your ability to recognize ambiguities and their effects on arguments. One needs only to consider the following actual headlines to know that clarity of meaning is important if one wants to be both understood and taken seriously:
Kids Make Nutritious Snacks.
Stolen Painting Found by Tree.
Miners Refuse to Work After Death.
Old School Pillars Are Replaced by Alumni.
Red Tape Holds Up New Bridge.
No doubt, the writers of these headlines thought their meaning was clear and did not intend to be funny.
Please answer this part: Discuss whether this argument of the egoist depends on an ambiguity?
The ethical theory called "Psychological Egoism" maintains that people always act selfishly so as to seek their own satisfaction or good. Consider this argument:
Yes, we do things for others, but we get satisfaction out of doing them, and this satisfaction is our end for doing them. Doing things for others is only a means to this satisfaction. Hence, even in doing "altruistic" things for others, like taking them to see the ocean, we are seeking our own good. Discuss whether this argument of the egoist depends on an ambiguity?
Fun With Words. (n.d.). Ambiguous newspaper headlines. Retrieved February 27, 2009, from http://www.fun-with-words.com/ambiguous_headlines.html© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 11:57 am ad1c9bdddf
Welcome to BM! Please rate 5/5 for my 150 words of brainstorming. I appreciate your business and am honored to assist you once again!
As you briefly discuss whether this argument of the egoist depends on an ambiguity or not, I think that yes, it does represent this type. When you explicate the definition of what an ambiguity is, it involves a type of logical fallacy that makes an argument, which ...
150 words briefly discuss whether the sample arguments of the egoist depends on an ambiguity or not.
Vagueness, Ambiguity, and Clarity in Writing
• Identify what is vague and what is ambiguous about each.
• Explain how such vagueness and ambiguity influences understanding.
• Describe the relationship between critical thinking and clear writing.
When I started reading this excerpt, and read the two concepts, I agreed with what they said about accepting both ideas. They make perfect sense, at least to me. Then I read more... I found this excerpt to be sort of strong. The author explained the argument behind both beliefs very well. With the idea they said that it is up to a person to do something or anything.
Argument is used in the readings by stating that there are two beliefs and both beliefs have a reason of being if they are true or is not true. The readings that offer logic regarding on the beliefs are true or not and presents facts for the argument. The two beliefs are connected and do something in some way about something else. It all just depends on the beliefs and the claims that show and if the logic has good support to prove that they argument can be correct or cannot be correct. Anyone can have an opinion something but to make someone believe the belief there has to be an argument and logic.View Full Posting Details