Determine the ethical implications of businesses polluting in a third world and reasons a business may conduct operations in a third world country. Disregard any standards of pollution control. It has been said that pollution is the price of progress, assess the connections between economic progress and development on the one hand and pollution controls and environmental protection on the other.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 7:15 am ad1c9bdddf
When speaking of ethics, there are a few different ones to consider. Certainly there are the ethics surrounding damaging the earth, but there are also the ethics of progress and business, as well as the socioeconomic ethics of the needs of the society.
Third world countries should be allowed to develop to become more prosperous, however, they will be doing so in a time where increased knowledge of the developed world will attempt to possibly hinder progress based on new rules. Does India not have the right to use nuclear power, or coal power to increase its ...
Business and it's effects on pollution and development is determined.
Does free trade hard the environment? Sustainability.
Does free trade harm the environment?
Environmentalists argue that trade liberalization harms the environment. The decisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in particular have been the subject of much criticism. Carbaugh has described environmentalists' three primary assertions (Carbaugh, 2004):
1.Trade liberalization leads to a "race to the bottom" in environmental standards.
2.Trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies.
3.Trade liberalization encourages trade in products that create global pollution ("pollution havens").
Proponents of trade liberalization argue that freer trade might actually improve the quality of the environment. For example, the international environmental policy of the U.S. and other industrial nations is based on the "polluter-pays principle." This approach is intended to give producers the incentive to develop more pollution-control techniques (Carbaugh, 2004).
Part 1: Recreate the arguments/counter-arguments
As a group, use the Small Group Discussion Board to recreate the arguments for and against the three assertions noted above (six arguments total). You and your group mates should each choose one of the six arguments and present the argument to the group. (If there are not exactly six members in your group, divide the work as equitably as possible.) Approach this assignment as an exercise in critical thinking; your goal is to represent a party's argument as accurately and as thoroughly as possible. For each argument and counter-argument, present the following information:
1.The party you represent
2.Your party's interests or objectives
3.Your party's assertion
4.A summary of the available evidence that supports your party's assertion and/or examples that illustrate the assertion.
Feel free to use the Library or other Web resources to help recreate the arguments.
Part 2: Summarize and evaluate the arguments/counter-arguments
1.Summarize each argument and counter-argument. Be sure to note the relevant parties in the debate and their interests/objectives.
2.Evaluate the arguments and counter-arguments. Be sure to address the following questions:
Can the conflicting positions in these debates be resolved? If yes, how? If not, why not? Your answer should be well-reasoned and supported with examples.
The response addresses the queries posted in 1497 words with three references.View Full Posting Details