I plan to write a paper on the environmental impacts of a rich versus a poor country. What factors do I need to examine and how should I compare the factors to the rich versus the poor country.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 12:45 am ad1c9bdddf
While both rich and poor (or developed and developing - a more technically correct designation) have environmental problems, most are quite different in scope and aspect, but not all....and some of them, even the disparate ones, are related from rich to poor. So, something to look at, and places to do so:
Population is one aspect that all have in common. Regardless of other things, resource use depends highly on the sheer numbers of people using "stuff". That being said, the amounts and types of stuff used from rich to poor vary a lot, and this is where we begin:
In poor countries, usually population growth is higher than richer countries (look up "demographic transition" for particulars on why) - the point here is that the nations that are the least equipped to deal with ...
Answer discusses some of the fundamental differences between rich (developed) nations and poor (developing) nations. Includes HTML attachment with live reference links.
Here is the problems:
1. Does the structure of the global economy allow poor countries to catch up with rich ones? Is the Solow model a useful framework for understanding whether poor countries tend to catch up with rich ones? How do Sachs and Rodrik differ regarding the policies that are most likely to promote catching up?
2. To what extent is the Solow model a useful framework for understanding the growth of nations?
3. Compare and contrast Sachs and Warner vs. Rodrik on the sources and best means of attaining economic growth.
4. What does, and what doesn't, the Solow model tell us about the sources of economic growth and the best policies for attaining high per capita incomes?View Full Posting Details