Utilizing https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_mastering-strategic-management/ link, Write a 400 word paper does the following:
Develop arguments that one of the key issues discussed in this chapter (vision, mission, goals; assessing organizational performance; CEO celebrity; entrepreneurial orientation) is the most important within organizations. Provide rationale for your argument.
Based on the chapter discussed Howard Schultz and Starbucks on several occasions. Based on your reading of the chapter 2, how well has Schultz done in dealing with setting a vision, mission, and goals, assessing organizational performance, CEO celebrity, and entrepreneurial orientation?
Write a vision and mission for an organization or firm that you are currently associated with. How could you use the balanced scorecard to assess how well that organization is fulfilling the mission you wrote?
Support your responses with at least four scholarly sources.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 1:20 pm ad1c9bdddf
The response addresses the query posted in 608 words with APA references
//The discussion throws light on the various aspects of the organization like vision, mission, organizational performance and many more that need to be analyzed. In addition to this, the arguments and opinions of Schultz have been discussed that describes the vision, mission and goals of the organization. Apart from this, the vision and mission statements of the current organization have been discussed. At last, balanced scorecard and its ways of measuring performance have been discussed.//
In chapter 2, the vision, mission and goals of the organization are discussed in detail, and their importance has been focused. It has been evaluated that the strategic leaders need to ensure that their organization clearly defines the vision, which states the aspirations of the organization. Along with it, the mission statement should be highlighted, which reflects the role of the organization in the society. The goals of the organization aim to fulfill the mission and vision of the organization (Fairholm & Farber, 2009). Organizational performance refers to a multidimensional ...
The expert examines leading strategies for developing arguments. The response addresses the query posted in 608 words with APA references.
International Trade Relation
Does free trade harm the environment?
Environmentalists argue that trade liberalization harms the environment. The decisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in particular have been the subject of much criticism. Carbaugh has described environmentalists' three primary assertions (Carbaugh, 2005):
1. Trade liberalization leads to a "race to the bottom" in environmental standards.
2. Trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies.
3. Trade liberalization encourages trade in products that create global pollution ("pollution havens").
Proponents of trade liberalization argue that freer trade might actually improve the quality of the environment. For example, the international environmental policy of the U.S. and other industrial nations is based on the "polluter-pays principle." This approach is intended to give producers the incentive to develop more pollution-control techniques (Carbaugh, 2005).
In this group project, you will recreate and evaluate the arguments and counter-arguments for all three of the environmentalists' assertions described above.
Part 1: Recreate the arguments/counter-arguments
As a group, use the Small Group Discussion Board to recreate the arguments for and against the three assertions noted above (six arguments total). You and your group mates should each choose one of the six arguments and present the argument to the group. (If there are not exactly six members in your group, divide the work as equitably as possible.) Approach this assignment as an exercise in critical thinking; your goal is to represent a party's argument as accurately and as thoroughly as possible. For each argument and counter-argument, present the following information:
1. The party you represent
2. Your party's interests or objectives
3. Your party's assertion
4. A summary of the available evidence that supports your party's assertion and/or examples that illustrate the assertion.
Part 2: Summarize and evaluate the arguments/counter-arguments
As a group, collaborate to write a 4-5 page document in which you:
1. Summarize each argument and counter-argument. Be sure to note the relevant parties in the debate and their interests/objectives.
2. Evaluate the arguments and counter-arguments. Be sure to address the following questions:
Can the conflicting positions in these debates be resolved? If yes, how? If not, why not? Your answer should be well-reasoned and supported with examples.