Change management is essentially a communication strategy that reduces anxiety and concerns in those being affected in order to help them accept change. The best-known planned-change processes, the force field analysis model has resulted from the work of Kurt Lewin. Two other theories of Change Management will be discussed here; Appreciative Inquiry and Parallel Learning Structure.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 16, 2018, 6:39 pm ad1c9bdddf
See Attached File
Change management is essentially a communication strategy that reduces anxiety and concerns in those being affected in order to help them accept change. The study of organizational development has generated a number of models for change management. The best-known planned-change processes have resulted from the work of Kurt Lewin. Lewin basically viewed change as a process of shifting from one permanent state to another through a sequence of steps. (Galloway, 2004)
Two other theories of Change Management will be discussed here; Appreciative Inquiry and Parallel Learning Structure. According to Egan and Lancaster (2005), the three theories agree on several points, they all:
1. Engage real social systems
2. Are change oriented processes interested in making improvements beyond the current organizational state
3. Are interactive and require involvement by organizational stakeholders
4. Tend to be cyclical and iterative processes
Lewin's Force Field Analysis Model
The work of social psychologist Kurt Lewin dominated the practice of change management for over 40 years. However, in the past 20 years, Lewin's approach to change, particularly the 3-Step model, has attracted major criticisms. (Burnes, 2004) Nonetheless, Lewin's contributions to the field have been immeasurable.
For example, Lewin developed the force field analysis model to help explain how the change process works. This model helps change agents diagnose the forces that drive and restrain proposed organizational change. Although developed over 50 years ago, Lewin's force field analysis model remains the prominent lens through which this process is viewed.
One side of the force field model represents the driving forces that push organizations toward a new state of affairs. Some of the driving forces external to an organization include globalization, information technology, and a changing workforce. Along with these external forces, some corporate leaders create driving forces within the organization; for example they may increase competition across company departments and encourage new practices and values that the leader believes are inherently better. (McShane and Von Glinow, 2004)
The other side of Lewin's ...
1300 word paper on three change management theories: Force Field Analysis, Appreciative Inquiry and Parallel Learning Structure
• Assume that you recently received your MBA and now work as an assistant to the CFO of a large corporation. Your boss has asked you to prepare a financial forecast for the coming year. Address the following questions:
• How would you set up the model to be presented to the executives? How many scenarios would you choose? What other information would you provide? What would you not include and why?
• What are the pros and cons of being able to examine the results of changing dividend policy and capital structure policy?
• What are the values of financial forecasting? What is your opinion of the most important points to keep in mind when creating financial forecasts?
• Why is the NPV method for budgeting accepted as the most valuable budgeting tool? If you were not allowed to use NPV for a budget you were developing, what other method(s) would you use? Explain your choices.
• Project S has a cost of $10,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $3,000 per year for 5 years. Project L costs $25,000 and is expected to generate cash flows of $7,400 per year for 5 years.
• What is the NPV, IRR, MIRR, and PI for each project, assuming a 12 percent cost of capital?
• Which project would you select, assuming they are mutually exclusive, using each ranking? Why? Which project should you actually choose? Why?
• How do simulation analysis and scenario analysis differ in the way they treat very bad and very good outcomes? What does this imply about using each technique to evaluate risk?
Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller are considered the architects of capital structure theory. They had many ideas regarding capital structure and the implications of that structure on a firm's performance. Since their first article was published in 1958, many financial theorists have attempted to test the validity of existing capital theories. This assignment will allow you to take a look at some major capital structure theories and how they influence finance.
• What does the following statement mean to you? "One type of leverage affects both EBIT and EPS. The other type affects only EPS."
• What conclusions did Modigliani and Miller draw regarding the effect of capital structure on a firm's value and cost of capital, assuming no corporate taxes?
• How do their conclusions change when each introduces corporate taxes? Explain.
• If a firm's managers thought that Modigliani and Miller were exactly right, what capital structure would they choose to maximize their firm's value? Why?
• Choose two criticisms of the MM models of capital structure. Write an argument positing that those criticisms do not outweigh the benefits of those theories.
• Have you ever wanted to go into business for yourself? Why or why not?
• What tradeoffs does the entrepreneur face?
• Why is entrepreneurship so important in a market economy?