CSR and Legal Obligations

Solution Preview

https://jcsr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40991-019-0045-8
https://opentextbc.ca/businessethicsopenstax/chapter/corporate-law-and-corporate-responsibility/

The determination of whether to ensure the program is provided to engineering specialists hinges upon whether the organization should place social issues ahead of profits or whether management shouldn't be capable of determining the types of social issues discriminately chosen to pursue. The Supreme Court has ruled that corporate law is not mandated to pursue profits above all else, and therefore, organizations possess discretion in regard to whether to voluntarily or mandatorily engage in CSR programs. When deciding whether to undertake the proposed testing, the legal theory on morality should be utilized because it enables an analysis of the company's economic objectives and its CSR obligations to its stakeholders.

In this regard, the company's moral obligations can be ascertained by assessing the legal responsibilities of the business by connecting accountability to managers who possess the duty toward employees as stakeholders because they are agents of the company and on the frontline of any CSR initiatives. "You" must decide whether there is an ethical requirement for the business to provide its electrical engineer specialists with specialized training based upon the businesses' interpretation of what is fair, just, and right. It's the responsibility of the company to minimize harm to stakeholders but also attempt to ensure equality throughout the organization.

When assessing the two options, I'd suggest the use of the Triple Bottom Line framework because it is predicated upon measuring CSR by analyzing the impact that business decisions have on adding value to the company through three different dimensions including societal, environmental, and economic dimensions. Both legal and moral aspects of responsibility to employees must be weighed wherein duties imposed upon the organization require them to legally provide the resources and primary functions when assigning roles to employees to ensure that employees can meet the legal requirements to achieve their assigned roles in accordance with the law and contractual engagements.

Organizations possess a moral if not legal obligation in relation to the primary functions of roles assigned to employees wherein the objective is to ensure that every engineering specialist within the company has the most beneficial potential impact on productivity for the company. In addition to these moral obligations to shareholders and stockholders, there ...