Explore BrainMass

Professional Ethical Dilemma

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Applying a Decision-Making Framework

Assignment: Fully Applying a Decision-Making Framework

? Read the Locker Room Talk Ethics Case

? Analyze the case using stakeholder impact analysis and the philosophical approaches to
ethical decision making.

? Explain what you think Albert should do in 700- to 1,050-words.

Review the questions below to help analyze the case.

? What is the ethical dilemma in the case?

? What events led to the dilemma?

? When describing the dilemma, did you mistakenly propose a solution?

? Have you identified stakeholders?

? What is their stake in the case?

? Have you described every stakeholder in an objective, unbiased way?

? Have you clearly stated the course of action Albert should take?

? What reasons support your decision?

? What philosophical approach did you use to reach your decision?

? What are the weaknesses of your argument? Have you addressed

? How do you think each stakeholder will be impacted by your decision?

? Are there potential impacts on stakeholders that are difficult to anticipate? Have
you identified them?

? Do you present new evidence or analysis in the conclusion? Would it be more
appropriate in another section of the paper?

? Have you summarized the dilemma, your decision, and the potential impact on stakeholders?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 24, 2018, 11:47 pm ad1c9bdddf


Solution Preview

Albert Gable is caught up in an ethical dilemma that involves many stakeholders. The main stakeholders are Larry and his wife Susan, himself, the firm, and the loan officer. The ethical dilemma of the case is whether Albert should say anything about the apparent differences in account information present at the bank and detailed knowledge he has about them. His personal stake in the situation is a bonus he may not receive if he loses the clients' business. Albert can do several things. First, he can say nothing and get his bonus and pay his daughter's tuition. Second, he could confront Larry alone about the situation. Third, he could inform Susan face to face or anonymously regarding the scenario. Fourth, he could confront them together. Fifth, he can simply resign as their financial representative due to a conflict of interest and immediately lose the bonus.

Albert is a professional. His CPA credential mandates that he must uphold certain moral and ethical standards beyond considerations of the potential consequences. As such, the deontology framework is probably most applicable. This ethical decision making framework ...

Solution Summary

The solution describes what a professional should do to solve an ethical dilemma and what decision making framework should be used.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Handling an Ethical Dilemma as a Criminal Justice Professional

As a criminal justice professional, how would you act if you are confronted by your supervisor and asked to do something that was morally against your principles?

Give an example of a situation in the criminal justice field in which a moral or ethical dilemma could be presented to you. For this example, discuss the following:
• How you would approach the situation?
• What steps or actions would you or should you take?
• What are potential positive and negative consequences for various actions taken or not taken?
• What ethical principles (from consequentialism, deontology, and virtue theories, for example) would come into play in this situation?

Be sure cite all sources used in APA format

View Full Posting Details