Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Supreme Court case studies

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    1: use reading question 1
    Read American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League pages 459­460.
    Respond to the three Case Questions found in page 459.
    Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in the Critical
    Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Business questions. Argue both sides of all issues.
    2: use reading question 2
    Read United States v. Capital City Foods, Inc. ­ page 489.
    Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on how much cooked
    insect and rodent parts are you willing to have in your butter.
    Provide convincing arguments for both sides of your recommendations.
    3: use reading question 3
    Read Sections 24.7 Endangered Species (p. 506); 25.1 Adverse Possession (p. 527); 25.5
    Adverse Possession (p. 528); 22.4 Resale Price Maintenance (pp. 471­472); and 23.7 Fair Debt
    Collection (p. 491).
    Check the decisions of the highest appellate courts, if a case is cited, for each fact pattern.
    Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether each of the
    subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios.
    4: use reading question 4
    Read Section 22.9 Ethics page 473.
    Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the 3 questions
    found at the end of Section 22.9. Argue both sides of all issues

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 8:07 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/business/business-law/supreme-court-case-studies-608806

    Attachments

    Solution Preview

    1: use reading question 1
    Read American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League pages 459­460.
    Respond to the three Case Questions found in page 459.
    Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in the Critical
    Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Business questions. Argue both sides of all issues.

    The facts of this case are that the NFL attempted to enter into a joint venture while avoiding Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act's coverage. This resulted in the NFL being held to account as the Supreme Court ruled that the League's licensing of intellectual property constituted concerted action that was not categorically beyond Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act's coverage. Therefore, the NFL's decision to choose only Reebok while denying other companies such as American Needle licensing rights was a concerted activity covered by Section 1 of the Act. This was unethical on behalf of the NFL and it does have an impact on other leagues such as Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association. who also have independently managed business, whose objectives are not common but may only allow licensing for one company.
    http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2009/2009_08_661

    2: use reading question 2
    Read United States v. Capital City Foods, Inc. ­ page 489.
    Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on how much cooked
    insect and rodent parts are you willing to have in your butter.
    Provide convincing arguments for both sides of your recommendations.

    Quintessentially, this case revolved around the government overstepping its authority and attempting to ...

    Solution Summary

    Supreme Court case studies are examined.

    $2.19