Explore BrainMass

Apple vs. Samsung

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Please help me to answer the questions using the cases in the attached file.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:08 am ad1c9bdddf


Solution Preview

Case 1
1. The case of restrictive car practices illustrates monopoly and anti-competitive practices. Secret agreements to keep British car prices high are evidence. Manufacturers fixing prices through selective and exclusive distribution is another example of monopoly and anti-competitive practice. Selling only through official dealers is an example. The fact that car buyers in Britain were paying 10 to 12 percent more than those in France, Germany, and Italy for the same models is evidence of monopoly and anti-competitive practice. The fact that car makers were blocking cheaper European cars is evidence that monopoly and anti-competitive practices were taking place. Threat of losing dealership, if dealers sell to UK buyers, and procrastination by manufacturers in making delivery of right hand drive models to European dealers, are examples ...

Solution Summary

The answer to this problem explains monopoly power and restrictive trade practices. The references related to the answer are also included.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs. iPhone 5

I need help creating a comparison between S3 and the new iPhone 5.

Marketing Strategy!
Which one is for you, the Samsung Galaxy S3 or new iPhone 5?
Now that Apple's new iPhone has been announced, you may be dithering about whether to upgrade your current iPhone 4S or switch to another platform altogether--Android perhaps.
To help you decide, put together the specs of the iPhone 5 compared with its predecessor, as well as a very popular Android smartphone--the Samsung Galaxy S III (S3).

View Full Posting Details