Explore BrainMass
Share

Utilitarian analysis on whether Ford Motor's decision

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

I need to write a paper deciding the best utilitarian analysis on whether Ford Motor's decision to produce the Ford Pinto as it did was ethically justifiable. The paper should needs show an understanding to using a utilitarian approach when evaluating a moral issue. It should clearly describe the action I am evaluating. It should present the various considerations that lead me to make the moral judgment about the action. I need to consider all the consequences of the action and all those affected. The cost benefits aren't necessary.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 10:32 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/business-ethics/utilitarian-analysis-whether-ford-motors-decision-617140

Solution Preview

The response addressed the query is posted in 1107 words with APA Reference.

//The utilitarianism is a concept which is applied in assessing that the action taken was morally good or not. In this context, in the following discussion, the utilitarianism concept has been explored with the case study of Pinto model launched by Ford motors.//

Ford produced a car named Pinto in the year 1971, which proved to be a great success for the company (Ford Pinto Explained 2016). This car outperformed the competition in the market, and the sales of Ford were increased dramatically. Despite the financial success of this model, it has been criticized on the utilitarian grounds. The utilitarian approach seeks to promote the production of the goods in a manner that saves the consumers from harm. According to this approach, a balance of goods over harms is needed to be maintained to be morally good (Sheng, 2012). The concept of utilitarianism helps in deciding whether the particular course of action is morally good or not.

The ethical issue was involved in the manufacture of Pinto by Ford. Pinto model was tested before the launch in the market to ensure that it meets the standard requirement (Ford Pinto Explained 2016). However, the prototypes of the car tested for quality were found unsuccessful in meeting the standards of the National Highway Traffic Administration. Pinto model of Ford was reported to be prone to the fire risk even in the case of small accidents. This problem in the model raised the question in front of the managers that should they revise the design or continue with the old one (Ford Pinto Explained 2016).

The management of the company decided to go ahead with the existing design without caring about the consumers' safety. The ...

Solution Summary

The expert provides utilitarian analysis on whether Ford Motor's decision. The response addressed the query is posted in 1107 words with APA Reference.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Utilitarian Paper on The Ford Pinto Case Study

A number of critics have claimed that the Ford Motor Company acted unethically in producing the Ford Pinto as it did, knowing that it could have been made safer by adding an inexpensive part. Read carefully the Case Study, "The Ford Pinto Case" in De George, pp 298-99.

You are to decide on the basis of the best utilitarian analysis you can construct, whether Ford Motor's decision to produce as it did was ethically justifiable. Your discussion should show that you understand what using a utilitarian approach to evaluating a moral issue involves. You should clearly describe the action that you are evaluating. You should present the various considerations that lead you to make the moral judgment you make about the action. Be sure to consider all the consequences of the action you analyze for all those affected by the action. Do not focus only on the cost-benefit analysis presented in the case.

Assume you are writing for a general audience (many of whom may disagree with you), and write in such a way as to try and convince your readers, by the strength of your analysis, that you are correct in your moral judgment. Hence, you should present and develop the utilitarian arguments that lead to your judgment, and you should not simply state your beliefs. Your analysis should conclude, as a result of the utilitarian analysis you have made, with the conclusion to which that analysis leads. Be careful not to prejudge the case either by describing it as unethical (or ethically justifiable) to begin with or by concluding it is justifiable (or unjustifiable) before you finish the analysis. To help you through the steps of a utilitarian analysis there's a guide on page 56 in your text.

View Full Posting Details