1. It has now become a best practice for the Board of Directors to be responsible for bringing in a substantial part of the budget through fundraising. Do you know of boards that are doing that successfully? What resistance is coming from the Boards to doing their jobs?
2. Part of the responsibility of the Board is to sign a Whistleblower policy, a Statement of Confidentiality, and a Code of Ethics. Either provide samples from your own organization or provide samples from research.
3. To me, ethics is the only thing in the world that is black and white. You can't be ethical at home and be unethical at work. You can't say you value 'not stealing' and take a pen from a company. There is no such thing as "situational ethics"........you may steal to feed a hungry child, but it is still unethical. You can't have it both ways. You are either ethical or you are not. It has been determined by many studies that most people are unethical......they tell little white lies, they grab something that is not theirs, etc.
What do you think? Is there a grey area?
Please include references.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 10:01 am ad1c9bdddf
1. Locally, the charities I know, their boards do not bring in substantial part of the budget through fundraising. The charities have endowments, and get some grants from the government. Some local fundraising events are manned by volunteers. The board members play some administration role but do not directly ask for contribution. I know that some large organizations in the US are bringing in funds successfully. These include the Catholic Medical Mission Board, Operation Blessing International Relief & Development, and Child Fund International. The resistance coming from boards to do their jobs is that the board members had not been raising funds in the past and they do not want to raise funds now, board members feel that the charity investments are enough to finance the activities, and the board members also make significant donations.
The resistance is that some board members only make token gifts every year and this is not ...
The answer to this problem explains issues related to non-profit organizations. The references related to the answer are also included.
Nonprofit sector and the market economy
1. Respond to the following in 3-4 paragraphs
What role(s) should the nonprofit sector play in a market economy; should nonprofits be entrepreneurial; should nonprofits compete with for-profit businesses? Should there be special "set asides" for nonprofit organizations; is "cause-related marketing" a good idea or just a marketing ploy; and, should business strategy be tied to philanthropy? What is your informed opinion (i.e. you need to back up our thoughts with some information, data, and/or references to other thinkers)? Comment on these and other questions of your own choosing.
2. Then respond to the following post adding incite, desputing and or supporting with additional information in 1-2 paragraphs:
Anheier describes, "the majority of available theories of nonprofit organizations are economic in nature, i.e. they involve some notion of utility maximization and rational choice behavior" (p. 155). This is broken down by many terms, an important one being pure public goods which are "goods to which no property rights can be established and which are available to all irrespective of contribution" (p. 117). The role that the nonprofit sector plays in the market economy is to provide these pure public goods, whereas the markets provide pure private goods. Pure private goods are "goods with individual property rights, and their productions, exchange, and consumption generates no externalities" (p. 117). There is a need to have the balance between the nonprofit sector and the economic market to avoid free-rider problems, off set high transaction costs, and market failure.
I do believe that nonprofits, while built to offer public goods to the community that are not offered in the public sector, still need to have a business plan tied to the philanthropic mission to be efficiently operated. A well-structured plan for a nonprofit will lead to a better future with more structured volunteerism, leadership, and commitment to the mission served. Cause marketing is a strong way to make your mission a "house-hold" name and it is an easy way for people to support the cause within their everyday lives. So while in many cases, cause marketing can be argued to be a marketing ploy, I think that it overall is best for all parties involved by its outcomes.
3. Then read the following 2 papers (they are attached) and comment on them telling what you liked, disliked, would challenge, agree with, and/or found interesting in 1-2 paragraphs.View Full Posting Details