In the expression, "The end justifies the means," the end is the outcome or result and the means is what one does to achieve the outcome or result. If the end is something that is good or right, then does that end justify any means you might use to get there? With respect to working conditions, for example, some might say that the hazards present in the meatpacking industry are justified by the cost-effective production that results.
1.Who are the stakeholders in this question?
2.Are the hazardous working conditions in this industry justified? Or not?
Explain your position.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:54 am ad1c9bdddf
The stakeholders in this question are the executive team, management and owners of the meatpacking plants. Their revenue is directly impacted if there are changes to the regulations or safety requirements that may impose cost increases in production based on new ...
An argument that the ends do not justify the means in the meatpacking industry.
United States Constitution and the United States legal system
In 700-800 words describe the role of the United States Constitution and the United States legal system in business regulation. Please include an example, which demonstrates how a Constitutional right affects a bank or credit card business and how the legal system is used with respect to recognizing or protecting that right.
Be sure to properly cite at least two references. If you use an electronic source, include the URL. If you use an additional printed source please attach a copy of the data to your response.View Full Posting Details