Milgramâ??s obedience experiments shed a shocking and uncomfortable light on what extent people will follow orders. Consequently, the experimenterâ??s perceive authority evidently was a strong influence on the participants.
How true are these statements? Please briefly elaborate your opinions on each the statements you have answered.
1). Does this tell us a couple things about humans? First is that we are, in general, conditioned to respond to authority and secondly that it goes back to how we were raised to listen to our parents and elders.
2). Does it seems like the participants were simply doing what they were told?
3). Does this make you wonder how many of them, though they may have felt genuine remorse, use that as an excuse to justify their behavior?© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 5:28 am ad1c9bdddf
Please rate 5/5 for my 100 words of ideas and reference. I appreciate your business!
1). To me, this experiment offers strong but shocking insight about humans and our conditioning responses to authority figures, even evil ones. Perhaps it does also reflect to how we listened and obeyed our parents and ...
Using the the Milgram's study as a lens, this solution discusses issues related to obedience to authority.
Obedience to Authority
In 2007, actor/reporter Darren Brown re-created Stanley Milgram's famous Obedience to Authority experiment as part of his United Kingdom television series, The Heist (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6GxIuljT3w). After viewing the 11 minute video, what surprised you most about the participants? Do you think the results would be similar if re-created, here, in the United States ? Why or why not? Finally, what implications do Milgram's 1960s work and Brown's "pseudo" re-creation in 2007 have on our understanding of the human condition?View Full Posting Details