Share
Explore BrainMass

Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health

An analysis of the position (amicus brief) is given below. Summarize the brief and explain whether you agree with all or part of it and why.

The amicus curiae brief submitted by the APA with much controversy surrounding it was Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health Inc (1982):

Discuss whether the City of Akron's adoption of an informed consent requirement for abortions, which mandated that the individual providing pre-abortion counseling must be the woman's attending physician (as opposed to other qualified professionals) and specified the kind and substance of the information to be presented was constitutional.

Solution Preview

Kindly rate 5 for my 100 words of notes and references:

As you briefly summarize, it involved an ordinance from Akron City Council that included numerous provisions to regulate abortions. These stipulations involved parental consent prior to performing procedures on an unmarried minor, a twenty-four hour waiting period, and other ramifications.

One APA cited article summarize it:

The Supreme Court Upholds Parental Notice Requirements. (1990). Family Planning Perspectives, 22(4), ...

Solution Summary

100 words of personal reactions are given to address, summarize, and assess briefly the Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health.

$2.19