Explore BrainMass

Public Policies and How They Are Implemented

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

It is important to understand public policies and how they are implemented to resolve a problem. Compare and contrast distributive, redistributive, regulatory, and morality policies. How does each benefit the public? Explain your answer.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 8:35 am ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

Public policies have been viewed as being heavily politically informed. When thinking about how public policies are implemented to solve a problem, it is important to keep the process of policy formation in mind.

-A policy is researched and initiated
-It is presented to the governing body that would defend or disapprove it. This can become a very complicated process which may entail revision after revision in consultation with industry experts/consultants
-After it is approved, then implementation begins. Policy implementation is the part of the policy process where the ideas presented are translated into actions that can produce measurable outcomes related to the policy goals (Mr. Glenn McRae, PhD; unpublished).

After the policy formation and implementation begins, it is helpful to think about the following questions:

-Why is it so difficult to get things done (with regard to policy implementation)?
-What are the different tools and instruments that can be used to achieve policy goals?
-How can public managers (the individuals responsible for policy implementation) be more effective in carrying out policy decisions?
(Mr. Glenn McRae, PhD; unpublished).

Public policy implementation includes public ...

Solution Summary

This solution will provide the student with explanations on distributive, redistributive, regulatory, and morality policies. It will also provide a guide for explaining how these policies benefit the public.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Political Competence and Corporate Citizenship

Senior executives from a variety of organizations are often called to testify about health policy issues. It is in the organization's best interest if these executives are both politically competent and good corporate citizens.

1. In general terms, what knowledge, skills, and individual behaviors must an executive have to be politically competent and to be good corporate citizens?

2. Think about a particular healthcare organization's corporate citizenship. How would you describe it (e.g., "good," "average," or "poor")? What did the organization do (or not do) to achieve this level of corporate citizenship?

View Full Posting Details