Purchase Solution

Analyzing if morality requires a religious base - James Rachels argument

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

James Rachels argues in "The Divine Command Theory" (the TA needs to know this argument to help me) that it cannot be accepted, even by religious believers, because it leads to serious doubts about the perfecton of God.

I need a TA to help me analyze his arguments concerning whether "morality" requires a religious base.

I don't agree that morality requires religious belief.
One of my arguments: Where does God gather information to set the standards of right and wrong?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Preview

Let me first address your question. I should point out that, strictly speaking, your question is not an argument. You need at least two statements, one of which is the conclusion, the other of which is the support or evidence for the conclusion. At the moment, all you have is a question. You could reformulate your question along the following lines: If God creates morality, God must know what are the standards of right and wrong. But the standards of right and wrong, if absolute, are not necessarily created by God. Indeed, God would need some justification for establishing these standards, if these standards are created by God. Instead, God recognizes the rightness of the standards, and, in effect, endorses them. (Where I'm heading here is a version of one of the arguments found in Plato's "Euthyphro", where Socrates asks if morality is created by the gods or exists independently of them...)

Some argue that morality does not exist, at ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
The World Health Organization

This quiz assesses the students knowledge about the World Health Organization. Although listed under “Philosophy” it is relevant to health care, political science, pre-med, and social scientist students as well.

Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy

Short quiz relating to Descartes

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Explaining Philosophy Concepts

    (our book " The elements of Moral Philosophy" by James Rachels) These are the questions that I find diffuclt to answer and I would appreciate it if you could provide short answers ( maybe one paragraph, that will allow me to understand the answer

  • Is morality determined by God's will or by man's reason?

    But if I follow God's command I do have a solution to the issue. A discussion regarding morality and the source from which we base our concept of morality. Over 600 words of original text.

  • UTILITARIANISM: BACKGROUND, BIOGRAPHY AND A SKETCH OF THE THEORY

    We have a positive duty to do our utmost to alleviate the suffering of others. REFERENCES: Rachels, James. (2003) The Elements of Moral Theory.

  • A critical analysis of Kant's ethical theory

    • The supreme principle of morality is called, however, THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -It is derived from the concept of A MORAL IMPERATIVE [Kant's 2nd argument] ARGUMENT SUMMARY Since moral commands apply to us irrespective of our own goals and

  • Does the social contract theory limit moral requirements?

    Rachels claims that one of the benefits of social contract theory is that it finds a reasonable limit to what morality can require of us. Is this reasonable limit really reasonable, though? And does it impact the notion of impartiality?

  • Traditional and Modern Ethics

    James Rachels has an excellent discussion of both of these in his book on ethics, "Can ethics provide the answers" (URL: http://www.amazon.com/Ethics-Provide-Answers-James-Rachels/dp/0847683486). Also see attached articles.

  • Practical Implications of Utilitarianism

    shallow pond and the envelope are supposed to provide an argument to show that we need to reject ordinary morality on this point

  • Relationship between Traditional and Modern Ethics

    James Rachels has an excellent discussion of both of these in his book on ethics, "Can ethics provide the answers" (source: http://www.amazon.com/Ethics-Provide-Answers-James-Rachels/dp/0847683486). Also see attached articles.

  • Does God really exist?

    (William James, Will to Believe) How to choose? Simplicity and rationality is the best standards. If the argument follows from simple premises and leads to a satisfying conclusion, then it is the best argument.

View More Related Solutions