Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Lagrange Multipliers Using The Implicit Function Theorem

    Not what you're looking for? Search our solutions OR ask your own Custom question.

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Please refer to the attachments for the questions.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com December 16, 2022, 11:05 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/math/functional-analysis/lagrange-multipliers-implicit-function-theorem-596120

    Attachments

    Solution Preview

    Please see the attached file for a properly formatted answer.

    There is a bit of confusion when it comes to notation. Theorem 3 and the Inverse function Theorem as stated in the file you provided shared some symbols such as $mathbf{X}, mathbf{U}$ but they are used differently as we point out below. To make things more clear I will use $mathbf{Y}$ instead of $mathbf{U}$ to denote $(x_3,dotsc,x_n)$. I write inside parentheses other comments about notation.

    Using the notation in Theorem 3 and its proof given in the attachment (except for $mathbf{Y}$ instead of $mathbf{U}$) let us write the problem in the setting of the Implicit Function Theorem (IFT) as stated in the attached file.

    We write $R^n=R^{(n-2)+2}$ (in IFT we use $n$ ``equals'' $n-2$ and $m=2$) and a point
    $(x_1,x_2,x_3,dotsc,x_n)=(mathbf{V},mathbf{Y})$, where $mathbf{V}=(x_1,x_2)inR^2$ and
    $mathbf{Y}=(x_3,dotsc,x_n)inR^{n-2}$ (we are using ...

    Solution Summary

    We clarify the use of the Implicit Function Theorem (IFT) in the proof of the theorem of Lagrange multipliers. We define the functions and check the hypotheses to use the IFT. We then check that the consequences provided by the IFT give what we need to prove the theorem of Lagrange multipliers.

    $2.49

    ADVERTISEMENT