Simple Proof By Contradiction

Related BrainMass Solutions

• Proof methods

  c) proof by contradiction Proof. Suppose that x is even but x^2 is odd.

• Subgroup proofsno

  (b) Proof: If has a subgroup with finite index , since is simple and from the result in (b), is isomorphic to a subgroup of . But is a finite group, is infinite. This is a contradiction.

• R-module proof

  We get a contradiction. Therefore, is simple. Done. The rest part of your posting is talking about the Jordan-Holder Theorem and did not give any questions. This is a proof that the R-module is simple if and only if I is a maximal ideal.

• Proof by Contradiction: 3n + 2 is Even, N is Even

  424425 Use the proof by contradiction method. Assume that n is a positive integer. Use the proof by contradiction method to prove and explain if 3n + 2 is an even integer then n is an even integer.

• Integer Proofs by Contradiction

  So, by (*), we know that n is an odd integer. This is a contradiction, as n is even. We complete our proof. Integer proofs by contradiction are provided.

• Isomorphisms and eigenvalues

  This is a contradiction. Thus can not have an eigenvalue This is a proof regarding isomorphisms and inverses. Linear transformation for isomorphism is denoted.

• Polynomial Rings and Composition Series

  Proof: Suppose the -module has a composition series as follows. Then we have The composition factors are , . Since each composition factor is simple, then is the proper maximal ideal in . Especially, is a maximal ideal in .

• contradiction

  426177 Proof of N-Vertex Simple Graph Prove or disprove: a. There exist a connected n-vertex simple graph with n+1 edges that contains exactly two cycles. b.

• Directional Derivative and Tangent Vector

  32281 Directional Derivative and Tangent Vector Give a simple proof or counterexample to disprove: If tangent vector p E Rn is such that the directional derivative of f by k vanished for every function f then k =0.

• Proof by contradiction

  113569 Proof by contradiction Show the error in the following fallacious "proof" that P  NP. Proof by contradiction. Assume that P = NP. Then SAT  P. So, of some k, SAT  TIME(nk).