Explore BrainMass
Share

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth Case

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Do you understand why the court would allow this affirmative defense in cases where there is no loss of tangible job benefit, but not cases where there is such a loss?(Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth Case)

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:12 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/law/labor-and-employment-law/burlington-industries-inc-v-ellerth-case-567025

Solution Preview

The reason that the affirmative defense was allowed is because of the fact that the company could reasonably have ...

Solution Summary

This solution analyzes Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth Case and the use of affirmative defense by the employer.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth

What do you think of the court not allowing the affirmative defense if there was a tangible employment action such as a discharge, demotion, or undesirable reassignment?(Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth case)

View Full Posting Details