Explore BrainMass
Share

International Laws and Disputes

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

How can international law be used to resolve disputes? Should countries recognize the Hague Abduction Convention and International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act above the rights of its own citizens?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 5:48 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/law/international-legal-studies/international-laws-and-disputes-435769

Solution Preview

First, it is helpful to distinguish between the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act 1993 (IPKCA) and Hague Abduction Convention.

The IPKCA is a United States federal law signed as Public Law 103-322 by President Bill Clinton on September 2, 1993. The IPCKA makes it a federal crime to remove a child from the U.S.A. or to keep a child who is a citizen of the U.S.A. in another crime with the intent to obstruct custodial rights. 18 U.S.C. § 1204.

The Hague Abduction Convention, on the other hand, is international law. It applies to parents and children who originate from a country that is a party to the Hague Convention. Specifically, twenty-three countries drafted the treaty on child abduction in 1976 at the Hague Conference on Private International Law. United States State Department, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Possible Solutions - Using ...

Solution Summary

Discusses international law from the standpoint of child kidnapping policies.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

International Law and International Court of Justice

This essay is an open material, so take your time and submit quality answers. The grading rubric is attached, so review it before you begin.
P.S: I save some links from my school library and some from some other school and some Journal articles website for you to make it easy for you to answer the 3 questions. I specify each question for each attachment link, so check those links for question 1, and so on. Please use the links on the attachments to answer the 3 questions, if you also have good scholarly sources you can use them.
P.S: Reference sources relied on by the student is cited appropriately and accurately. No writing of others is left without quotation and/or attribution, as appropriate. Bluebook format is used correctly and consistently.
Originality of the paper will be verified by Turnitin.. So please be original.
Question 1 of 3
34.0 Points
You tell a friend that you are taking an International Law class at APUS. The friend asks, "What exactly is International Law?" Tell your friend what International Law is, and include in your discussion the various sources of international law (about 6 sources). Ensure your answer is 500+ words.
Question 2 of 3 33.0 Points
Describe the sources of the law of armed conflict. Provide examples to support your discussion (About 4 sources). Ensure your answer is 500+ words.
Question 3 of 3 33.0 Points
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) was established by the Charter of the United Nations, which provides that all Member States of the United Nations are ipso facto parties to the Court's Statute. The composition and functioning of the Court are organized by this Statute, and by the Rules of the Court which are drawn up by the Court itself. Describe the ICJ's jurisdiction and discuss the types of cases the Court hears. Also, explain whether or not the Court's rulings are binding on the parties (About 5 sources). Ensure your answer is 500+ words.
P.S: Please answer the three questions in Microsoft word document.

View Full Posting Details