Purchase Solution

Briefly Summarize the Case of Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth, fka Wyeth, Inc Supreme Court of the United States

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

In your own words, briefly summarize the case and describe the issues in this case.
In reviewing the Wyeth case, discuss the legal duties that were breached. Include in your initial post, the parties to this case and possible defenses to the allegation of breach.
Lastly, consider the implications of the decision in this case to healthcare providers and drug manufacturers. Do you agree or disagree with the reasoning of the court in this case? If you were the judge, how would you have decided this case?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

The solution briefly summarizes the case of Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth, fka Wyeth, Inc Supreme Court of the United States.

Solution Preview

Briefly Summarize the Case of Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth, fka Wyeth, Inc Supreme Court of the United States
Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

In your own words, briefly summarize the case and describe the issues in this case.
In reviewing the Wyeth case, discuss the legal duties that were breached. Include in your initial post, the parties to this case and possible defenses to the allegation of breach.
Lastly, consider the implications of the decision in this case to healthcare providers and drug manufacturers. Do you agree or disagree with the reasoning of the court in this case? If you were the judge, how would you have decided this case?

The ONLY legal duty that was breached in this case was the attempt by the plaintiffs to have the case heard in Pennsylvania ...

Solution provided by:
Raushaun Rigsby, MSc
Education
  • Associates of Arts , Lone Star Community College
  • Bachelor of Science , Sam Houston State University
  • Masters of Science, Kaplan University
  • Masters of Science , Kaplan University
Recent Feedback
  • "Thank you however I have two questions: 1.) where in this passage is the actual problem statement? 2.) if you used references can you please provide them? This is great work and I am so grateful. "
  • "Thank you very much"
  • "excellent analysis"
  • "graet job very helpful"
  • "Thank you, excellent and very detailed."
Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Criminal Defenses Review

Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Product Liability Lawsuit

    Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC - 09-152 (2011) 2. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC: Supreme Court of the United States Decision, Antonin Scalia (au), DIANE Publishing 100 Questions & Answers About Childhood Immunizations,Thomas H.

  • Wyeth v. Levine

    445661 Wyeth v. Levine Discussion: Read the below information on Wyeth v. Levine 1. Who was the plaintiff in this case? What was the complaint? 2. Who was the defendant? 3. In 2-3 sentences, briefly summarize the case. 4.

  • Saray Perez v Wyeth Laboratories, Inc

    82194 Saray Perez vs Wyeth Laboratories, Inc On what legal grounds did the court in Saray Perez v Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. decide whether or not the learned intermediary rule applies to pharmaceutical drugs advertised directly to consumers?

  • Change at Pfizer: Jeff Kindler rhe Wyeth Acquisition

    Topics should address: what are the issues of the case of the Wyeth Acquisition, cover the pros and cons of the acquisition of Wyeth, A current environmental scan of the company, and internal analysis, How is Pfizer positioned for the future.

  • An Example of How to Properly Brief a Case

    412431 Case: Bounds v Smith (1977) United States Supreme Court opinion in Bounds, Correction Commissioner et al v Smith et al. Please read this case and prepare a brief.

  • Whren v. United States - Racial Profiling

    632403 Whren v. United States - Racial Profiling Whren et al. v, United States, some argue this case allows the police to profile. Explain your position on the ruling. In Whren v.

  • the negotiation process

    Similarly, Wyeth can find another company willing to acquire it. Essentially, in case of Chrysler negotiations if United Auto Workers agrees to close down job banks, the company gets the government loan.

  • Kelo case and the majority opinion

    I have attached the answer in the following document. Susette Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of New London, Connecticut et al. Supreme Court of the United States 125 S.

  • Case Study - Legal Issue

    City and County of Denver M • Mathews v. Eldridge N • National Broadcasting Co. Inc. et al. v. United States et al. T • Transpacific Route Case U • United States v. Southwestern Cable Co. • Universal Camera Corp.

View More Related Solutions