Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Bush v. Gore

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Bush v. Gore,

    many critics portrayed the decision as the latest and best example of the

    contention that legal decisions are, at their core, just political decisions

    masquerading as higher law.

    a) To what extent is a â??politicalâ? element involved in every decision

    affecting peopleâ??s rights and protections?

    b) What does the argument in the opening paragraph above suggest about

    judicial selection procedures and about judicial review generally?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 1:41 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/law/history-and-philosophy-of-law/bush-v-gore-345051

    Solution Preview

    When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Bush v. Gore,

    many critics portrayed the decision as the latest and best example of the

    contention that legal decisions are, at their core, just political decisions

    masquerading as higher law.

    a) To what extent is a â??politicalâ? element involved in every decision

    affecting peopleâ??s rights and protections?
    Where rights and protections are involved there is a political element involved in every decision affecting people's rights and protections. The decisions relating to peoples' rights and protections are directly related to the Constitution and these are finally decided in the US Supreme Court. On the other hand the appointment of ...

    Solution Summary

    This posting gives you an in-depth insight into Bush v. Gore

    $2.19