Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Polcie Search

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    A senior federal agent is assigned to coordinate a particular investigation in a local high-crime area infested with drug dealing. A possible "stash" house has been identified and there reason to believe drugs are being sold to between 30-40 different customers each day. Thus far it has proved impossible to introduce an undercover agent/officer to the dealer to make a buy. In addition, it has been determined that even if an agent could get inside it would be too dangerous to do so given this gangs predilection for violence. The chosen strategy is to set up surveillance on the location and observe the constant flow of persons in and out of the location. After several weeks of surveillance, it has been observed that approximately 30-40 forty vehicles drive to the location each night between the hours of 10:00pm and 5:00am. They park and the driver or passenger runs inside. No one stays for loner than three minutes. Based upon drug enforcement training and experience it is known that this pattern is consistent with substantial drug sale activity. The agent decides that the best way to proceed with the investigation is to attempt to obtain a search warrant for the residence. He will establish that the individuals driving to the residence are receiving narcotics then the warrant can be obtained.

    The agent set up surveillance that evening with the plan that when cars leave they will be stopped and searched. If narcotics are found (even better if some of the customers decide to cooperate and give statements) he can apply for a warrant for the residence.

    What are the requirements for searching a vehicle as opposed to searching a residence. Is the threshold level for probable cause the same? Do both require the issuance of a warrant? Begin with a brief review of the constitutional provisions controlling searches and then distinguish the two scenarios.

    Need help in the right direction.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 1, 2020, 9:49 pm ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    In the US law the main principle is that evidence seized by police in violation of the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure cannot be used against the defendant at a trial.
    This material is taken from the website: http://www.srislawyer.com " In the United States, the police must, whenever practicable, obtain advance judicial approval of searches and seizures through the appropriate warrant procedure. In most instances, failure to comply with the warrant requirement can only be excused by exigent circumstances. There should be circumstances sufficient to warrant a prudent man to believe that the person stopped had committed or was committing an offense. Intrusions upon constitutionally guaranteed rights must be based on more than ...

    Solution Summary

    This solution gives you the requirements for searching a vehicle as opposed to searching a residence