The elements in the trial of Orenthal James (OJ) Simpson are as follows:
OJ was a famous football player and his trail has been brandished the crime of the century largely owing to his celebrity status.
He met his second wife, Nicole Brown, when she was 17. They married in 1985 and there was some degree of violence interspersing their relationship throughout. In 1989, Simpson was convicted of spousal abuse for beating her. In 1992 she divorced him, and in 1994 she was knifed to death along with her friend, Ron Goldman. Simpson was charged with their murders. On June 17, after failing to turn himself in, he became the object of a low-speed pursuit in a white Ford Bronco SUV. The pursuit, arrest, and trial were among the most widely publicized events in American history. The trial began on October 3, 1995 in a jury verdict of not guilty for the two murders. The verdict was seen live on TV by more than half of the U.S. population, one of the most watched events in American TV history. Reaction to the verdict was notable for its division along racial lines: polls showed that most African-Americans felt that justice had been served by the "not guilty" verdict, while most white Americans did not.
In a subsequent civil trial, where standards of proof are lower, Simpson was found liable for the deaths of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. He was ordered to pay damages totalling more than $33,000,000.
So, did O.J. Simpson get away with murder? In 2000, a BBC investigation suggested that in their rush to prove Simpson's guilt, police neglected a more likely suspect - Simpson's son by his first marriage, Jason (24 at the time of the killings). Jason had a history of violence; a professional chef who'd previously brandished knives when enraged. At the time, Jason was taking medicine to combat his anger issues, and his alibi for the night in question claiming he was at work was challenged by co-workers. Also, Nicole had said she thought Jason Simpson was stalking her.
Evidence Beyond Reasonable Doubt?
To many, particularly in minority communities, the trial of OJ became not so much a determination of his guilt or ...
Find a current or past court trial (via Internet or television) where an investigator or officer is called to testify. Evaluate the officer's role and if he/she follows the guidelines on pp. 129-34 of the text. Then evaluate one-fourth to one-half of the officer's court testimony. In 800-1,150 words, identify and summarize the trial you observed and evaluated. Explain:
The courtroom role of the investigator or officer.
How well the investigator or officer adhered to guidelines recommended in the text.
If the outcome of the case was affected positively or negatively by the testimony.
Methods or techniques that may have improved the investigator or police officer's
Where and how you found the court case, including a Web site link for an online
source or an APA formatted citation for a television source.
Please see attachment.View Full Posting Details