Purchase Solution

The Case of Ernesto Miranda

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

What is your opinion of the Supreme Court's decision in Miranda? Is Miranda necessary? Why do you feel this way? Explain and support your position.

Purchase this Solution
Solution Preview

One of the most historical cases in judicial history, the basis of this case involved Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona. Miranda was arrested and questioned for nearly two hours by detectives on rape and kidnapping charges. In summary, he was never informed of his rights prior to questioning and signed a written confession after the long ordeal. However, law enforcement stated that he made the confession on his accord and read his rights. Though Miranda wrote a statement of confession and verbally acknowledged the criminal act he was accused of, he was ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Miranda Rights

    The case was brought to trial where the written statement by Ernesto Miranda was submitted and allowed as evidence and Ernesto Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape.

  • Miranda Warning

    One of the most historical cases in judicial history, the basis of this case involved Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.

  • A Brief History of Miranda Warnings

    The Miranda Warnings was a judicial response to a 1966 case involving Ernesto Miranda a mentally disturbed man with a ninth grade education from Arizona who confessed to kidnapping and rape of a young girl.

  • Relationship of Escobedo to Miranda and their implications

    Miranda v. Arizona is still considered a landmark case among the rich history of U.S. Supreme Court cases.

  • Forensic Psychology Police Subspeciality

    Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery, was not properly notified of his rights before the police interrogation.

  • Bright-Line Rule of Miranda

    Miranda was actually Miranda v. Arizona and it was a 5-4 Supreme Court decision. The actual facts of the case concerned Ernesto Arturo Miranda.

  • Warren Court Importance

    Miranda vs. Arizona 1966 On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested with circumstantial evidence after someone identified him as the man who committed a kidnapping and rape of a 17-year old woman.

  • Miranda v. Arizona

    Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), a case which closely foreshadowed Miranda, provided for the presence of counsel during police interrogation.

  • Consequences of Supreme Court Decisions on Americans

    In this case an individual named Ernesto Miranda was arrested after being identified as a perpetrator of a crime by the victim. At the time, Miranda was not informed of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.

View More Related Solutions