Some terrorism analysts contend that the term "terrorist" is a tool used to demonize the opposing side. Accordingly, the only thing that separates a terrorist from a freedom fighter is the one who defines each as one or the other. Do you think that the term "terrorist" is a political tool that is used to diminish the legitimacy of the opposing side? In other words, do you believe that there is a difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter? If so, what is the difference? Can an act of terrorism be differentiated from an act of war? How and why?
The only difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is perception. Those who have the autonomy and power are able to control the narrative to dictate who are considered terrorists and who are considered freedom fighters. A prime example of this narrative would be the current civil war in Syria wherein the 'Free Syrian Army' is considered as terrorists by ...
Terrorism in wartime tools are determined. Whether terrorism can be differentiated From an act of war are determined.