Purchase Solution

Admissible Evidence in Criminal Law

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

A series of robberies and murders was occurring in the city. In three of these robberies, the robber staked out small businesses and after obtaining cash, shot the owner. There were no live witnesses to the crimes, no videos of the crime, and no fingerprints or DNA evidence. In a fourth robbery, the owner of a small grocery store was critically wounded but was alive and conscious enough to give an excellent description of the perpetrator. He then clearly identified the man from a photo array. Because of the critical condition of the victim, and immediate preliminary hearing was scheduled after the suspect was arrested and charged. The judge , the defense lawyer, and the prosecutor (with other court attendants) conducted the preliminary hearing in the hospital rooom of the victim in the presence of the defendant. Pain medication was withheld for a day from the victim at his request. The victim clearly identified the defendant as the robber was responded to cross-examination by the defense lawyer. An early trial date was set, but the victim died before the trial.

1. Neither the shooting nor the murder weapons were recovered, the trial began with no other evidence other than the testimony of the victim. Can the testimony of the deceased victim be used as evidence? Why?

2. The series of robberies and murders stopped with the arrest of the defendant. Can this be used as evidence?

3. "Ballistic fingerprints" were available, but no murder weapons were found that could be matched to the prints. Can the defendant be convicted of the other robberies and murders based on the available evidence?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

In the context of a series of robberies and murders, the importance of murder weapons, circumstantial evidence and ballistic fingerprints were examined. An important posting in criminal law.

Solution Preview

STEP 1

On the testimony of the deceased victim:

Yes, the testimony of the deceased victim can be used as evidence. There are several reasons for this. First, the victim had stopped pain killer medication a day before the testimony in the hospital. Second, the judge along with the defense lawyer and the prosecutor with court attendants were present during his testimony. Third, he was cross-examined by the defense lawyers. Fourth, the robber was clearly identified. Fifth, the victim identified the perpetrator from a photo array.

His testimony will be treated as if made in court and will stand as critical evidence in the ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Title VII

This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Criminal Defenses Review

Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.

Evidence

Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Use of Evidence: Inventory Search

    There are established protocols in law enforcement that police doing the inventory search must follow. It is this protocol that allows for the evidence acquired as being legally admissible.

  • US criminal justice system key elements in relation with a c

    To be properly preserved, the evidence should not be subject damage or destruction. As a computer forensic investigator it's important to know the types of evidence admissible in the US Criminal Justice System court of law.

  • Explanation of Reasonable Expecatation of Privacy.

    Law Enforcement and security personnel must quote Miranda rights (REP) before arresting a perceived criminal or all evidence collected will not be admissible in a court of law and the individual who committed the crime will not be punished.

  • Federal Rules of Evidence and Impeaching a Witness

    The court may, however, in a criminal case allow evidence of a juvenile adjudication of a witness other than the accused if conviction of the offense would be admissible to attack the credibility of an adult and the court is satisfied that admission in

  • The Ramifications of Digital Evidence

    In general, the courts view computer records, just as any other records, and seek to ensure that the records are reliable, before they are used in a court of law.

  • Exclusionary Rule in Probation and Parole

    Hewett (1967) says that formal rules of evidence do not apply at violation hearings, meaning hearsay is generally admissible. In another case, Gagnon v.

  • Guidelines for the courts to allow admission evidence

    Sometimes, a copy will not be admissible. The best evidence rule requires certain documents to be produced unless they can shown to be unavailable. 3) Hearsay: This is one of the largest and most complex areas of the law of evidence.

  • Admissible and non-admissible evidence

    203196 Is the evidence collected by the arresting officer admissible or non-admissible? With the following reading address the following...

  • The Admissibility of Character Evidence in trial

    2) Give 3 examples of a situation where character evidence is inadmissible in a criminal trial.

  • The Exclusionary Rule: A presentation creation guide

    - As a precedent set in the Elkins vs. the US in 1960, state officials obtaining evidence illegally may turn over said evidence to federal officials and in a federal case, such evidence becomes admissible.

View More Related Solutions