Exclusionary Rule in Probation and Parole
Not what you're looking for?
The greatest aspect of the American judicial system is the wide range of courts that deal with certain criminal and civil lawsuits. These courts are tasked with implementing laws and ensuring that constitutional rights are each citizen is upheld in these cases. Contrary to the lower courts is that of the highest. What is the Supreme Court's justification for denying the application of the exclusionary rule in probation and parole systems? Discuss specific case examples.
Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary
This solution explains why parolees' are not privileged to fourth amendment rights and explains why evidence produced through warrentless search and seizure is admissible during a violation of parole hearing. It includes one reference.
Solution Preview
Denial of the application of the exclusionary rule in probation and parole systems has long been an argument within our judicial system as it relates the constitutional rights of parolees. As we know, protection against illegal search and seizure is protected under the Fourth Amendment in how law enforcement attains evidence during the prosecution of an individual. Contrary to this was a decision made the U.S. Supreme Court under the exclusionary rule that states this does not apply to individuals on probation or parole. According to Abadinsky (2012), during ...
Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Title VII
This Quiz pertains to the spectrum of Human Rights through Title VII
Constitutional Law Rights
How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!
Evidence
Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!
Title VII Laws
Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.
Contract Requirments
How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!