A scoutmaster who has inadvertently lead his scouts into a cave that is filling with water and there is no way out except a narrow opening that the large scoutmaster has gotten himself stuck in.
Paramedics have arrived and cannot extract the scoutmaster from the opening of the cave and the scouts are now in grave peril. The only option left open to the paramedics is to sacrifice the scoutmaster. What are the correct actions and answers to the pertinent questions in this scenario?© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 3:46 am ad1c9bdddf
The basis for this assignment comes from the given case. In this case we are to come to a correct course of action. We are given the scenario of a scoutmaster who has inadvertently lead his scouts into a cave that is filling with water and there is no way out except a narrow opening that the large scoutmaster has gotten himself stuck in. Paramedics have arrived and cannot extract the scoutmaster from the opening of the cave and the scouts are now in grave peril. The only option left open to the paramedics is to sacrifice the scoutmaster. The following questions are asked of us:
1. What is the correct action for this case?
I am not sure if sacrificing the scoutmaster will mean he will die or if he will be rescued after the scouts. I will express my stance on the premise that he will be rescued after the scouts have been rescued.
I would rescue the scouts and try to save the scoutmaster later even if the postponement of rescuing the scoutmaster meant he would not survive. I would still save the scouts first, and then return for the scoutmaster.
2. First, justify your decision using duty-oriented reasoning.
Duty-oriented theory designates the right or wrong of actions based on the given action and does not base it on personal consequences or circumstances. This theory concedes that there are certain truths that all individuals must adhere to equally and without exception. These unyielding truths must have certain actions that coincide with the truth and that uphold the truth. There are many skeptics as well as supporters of this theory.
I stand by the decision to save the scouts due to the unyielding truth that every life is considered sacred. This means that doing the right thing is to save everyone. The dilemma here, however, is that checking all routes of escape to no avail and trying to free the scoutmaster, it becomes evident that the only course of action to save ...
This solution articulates duty-oriented reasoning.
Law & Ethics
For this project, justify your decision-making concerning the following situation:
You are a paramedic arriving at an emergency scene. A group of scouts have entered a cave that is now filling with water. They were led into the cave by a rather large scoutmaster. Unfortunately, while leading them out of the cave, the scoutmaster somehow managed to get stuck in a narrow opening with only his head and shoulders protruding out. With his upper torso stuck outside the cave, it appears the scoutmaster will survive, but all the boys below will drown if they cannot escape.
After you have checked all possible escape routes and have attempted to extricate the scoutmaster, it becomes clear that the only way to save the boys is to sacrifice the scoutmaster, so he can be removed. This is, unfortunately, not the Winnie the Pooh story where Rabbit has the option of waiting until Pooh loses weight. What is the correct action for this case?
First, justify your decision using duty-oriented reasoning.
Second, justify your decision using consequence oriented reasoning.
Third, justify your decision using virtue-ethics reasoning.
Based on your analysis, consider what might be the ultimate dilemma of ethics? Based on your consideration, answer the following questions: What happens when we apply differential standards (all valid) to healthcare decisions? How do we determine who is ultimately right when different decisions are reached?View Full Posting Details