Purchase Solution

Risk Analysis and Management: Fragility versus Loads and Fire Explosion Safety Issues

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

1. A propane tank is located 100 m away from the nearest buildings. The fragility to explosion can be expressed by

p = 0 for I < 0.7 MPa ? s
p = aI for 0.7 < I < 1.3 MPa ? s
p = 1 for I > 1.3 MPa ? s

Accounting for various release and ignition scenarios, including uncertainties, the estimated probability distribution of impulses resulting from such explosions is given by the following set of values:

I (MPa ? s) 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2
pload 0.06 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.04

Supposing that you can improve the building so that you can affect the threshold of damage, increasing it above 0.7 MPa ? s, and supposing the high end at 1.3 MPa ? s remains the same, and so is the linear in-between behavior:

(a) Where would you place the lower threshold if you wanted the failure probability not to exceed 5%?
(b) What would you do if your answer in (a) was the best you could do to improve the fragility, and you wanted a failure probability of less than 0.1% (moral certainty for no failures)?

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

The concept of fragility to explosion is explored. Probability distributions are used to calculate threshold for failure.

Solution Preview

(a) Where would you place the lower threshold if you wanted the failure probability not to exceed 5%?

At I = 1.3 MPa.s, the cumulative probability of fragility to explosion is equal to 1, so a = 1/1.3 = 0.7692.

If the lower threshold is 0.7 MPa.s, the discrete cumulative probability of fragility to explosion is given as follows:
I (MPa ? ...

Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
Architectural History

This quiz is intended to test the basics of History of Architecture- foundation for all architectural courses.