Explore BrainMass
Share

Pretend as if you are an economist and explain

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

In 2003, the Internal Revenue Service began to mail out refund checks because of a change in the tax law. Economic forecasters predicted that consumption and GDP would increase because of higher refunds on income taxes.

Pretend as if you are an economist and explain your thoughts on whether the tax cuts from the past few years have been successful in promoting economic growth or in preventing a deeper decline? Are there other changes to fiscal policy that you feel would have been more successful?

Objective: Identify current trends in macro and microeconomics.
Analyze the relationship between fiscal and monetary policy in an open economy.
Critically analyze the role of government in a market economy.
Use effective communication techniques.

Tax rebate or a tax refund is a tool of fiscal policy. A cut in tax rates is not the same thing as a tax cut. A decrease in the tax rates could lead to an increase in taxes collected if income rises enough to compensate for the lower tax rate. Fiscal policy is controlled by the President and the Congress at the federal level. The primary issue with fiscal policy is that expansionary fiscal policy where crowding out could occur See pages 156-158 and pages 332-333. The role of fiscal policy can be found on pages 212-216 The increase in the Fiscal Multiplier makes policy more powerful. See pages 213-214. The learning objective is to understand the role of fiscal policy and to explore your beliefs about how the economy should function. Keep in mind that assigning the contribution of a tax cut must be done in the presence of other events taken place simultaneously. Post your response directly to the forum. Do not use an attachments; do not use a link. Comment on other students' responses And recall that there is a second questions in this DB, "Are there other changes to fiscal policy that you feel would have been more successful? Post your sources in a reference list posted in APA format.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 16, 2018, 9:59 pm ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/economics/fiscal-policy/pretend-as-if-you-are-an-economist-and-explain-204177

Solution Preview

Effect of Tax Refund on Economy

Internal revenue service agency of the US is responsible for tax collection in the country. Currently, tax rates in the US are declining and this agency is refunding the checks to the public. The growth of the economy of a country is affected by the rate of taxes paid by its individuals. Tax cuts promote the economic growth because they encourage people to pay taxes. Lower tax rates will increase the investments and wage rates in the country. For an economy, tax cuts are necessary in the recession period. An increase in the revenue of the government due to tax cuts will also increase its public ...

Solution Summary

The response addresses the queries posted in 438 Words, APA References

$2.19
Similar Posting

One of the recent Nobel Prize winners for economics was Oliver E. Williamson, for his work on economic governance and limitations of firms, including the concept of asymmetric information. The text below is to a somewhat humorous, yet applicable, article that relates this concept to monogamy and offers ways to overcome it. Discuss the issue of asymmetric information as posed in the article).

Some people sincerely like monogamy; other people sincerely don't. Under the circumstances, it seems wise for everyone to just reveal their proclivities and pair up with people who share their expectations. Unfortunately, I don't see this happening. There is a fundamental flaw with monogamy, but it's not human nature. It's asymmetric information.

My key assumption: Most people - even most commitmentphobes - prefer a person who will be true to them. When you announce your religion, you make yourself less desirable to people who reject your religion, but more desirable to people who share it. When you announce your rejection of monogamy, in contrast, you make yourself less desirable even to people who share your rejection.

In a world of symmetric information, this wouldn't matter. People would know as much about your proclivities as you do, so there'd be no reason to pretend to be something you're not. But in the real world, no one knows your own preferences better than you do. The result: People pretend to be more monogamous than they really are.
This leads to two kinds of dissatisfaction. First, people who are monogamous feel abused and betrayed. Second, people who are not monogamous feel like they "can't be themselves. Taken together, I think these two complaints explain most of the bitterness people feel about the institution of marriage.

Based on the Game Theory you studied from the text, and your own research, what solutions can you suggest?

Can you help me with this assignment?

One of the recent Nobel Prize winners for economics was Oliver E. Williamson, for his work on economic governance and limitations of firms, including the concept of asymmetric information. The text below is to a somewhat humorous, yet applicable, article that relates this concept to monogamy and offers ways to overcome it. Discuss the issue of asymmetric information as posed in the article).

Some people sincerely like monogamy; other people sincerely don't. Under the circumstances, it seems wise for everyone to just reveal their proclivities and pair up with people who share their expectations. Unfortunately, I don't see this happening. There is a fundamental flaw with monogamy, but it's not human nature. It's asymmetric information.

My key assumption: Most people - even most commitmentphobes - prefer a person who will be true to them. When you announce your religion, you make yourself less desirable to people who reject your religion, but more desirable to people who share it. When you announce your rejection of monogamy, in contrast, you make yourself less desirable even to people who share your rejection.

In a world of symmetric information, this wouldn't matter. People would know as much about your proclivities as you do, so there'd be no reason to pretend to be something you're not. But in the real world, no one knows your own preferences better than you do. The result: People pretend to be more monogamous than they really are.
This leads to two kinds of dissatisfaction. First, people who are monogamous feel abused and betrayed. Second, people who are not monogamous feel like they "can't be themselves. Taken together, I think these two complaints explain most of the bitterness people feel about the institution of marriage.

Based on the Game Theory you studied from the text, and your own research, what solutions can you suggest?

View Full Posting Details