Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Alternative Fuel Vehicles

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    You have been assigned to a scientific commission whose mandate is to research ways of reducing air pollution from motor vehicles. Your specific assignment is to research the types of alternative-fuel vehicles that are currently under development, examine the advantages and disadvantages of each, and decide which would have the least environmental impact.
    Electric
    Natural gas
    Hydrogen
    Fuel Cell

    Use the Library and Internet to research each type of vehicle. Discuss the environmental and economic advantages and disadvantages of each type and select the one that, in your opinion, provides the best environmental impact at a reasonable cost. Provide evidence to support your selection.

    Objective: Explain the importance of atmospheric pollution.

    Be sure to look up information on each fuel type.

    Now, choose one of the fuel types that is in your opinion, the best choice for our environment and air pollution, greenhouse gases, etc. SUPPORT YOUR CHOICE WITH FACTS! DON''T JUST GIVE YOUR OPINION!

    Also, think about what exactly is air pollution? How do humans affect the amount of air pollution we now have? Do all countries affect it equally, or is there unequal pollution deposits from different areas of the world?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 9, 2019, 7:33 pm ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/earth-sciences/energy-and-the-environment/alternative-fuel-vehicles-121603

    Solution Preview

    As text below, and as HTML with live links attached:
    --------------------------------------------------------------

    OK, you list four technologies....and some overlap and a couple are not listed at all. So I will entertain these and a couple more. However, first and foremost let us entertain the underlying premise. That is the personal motor vehicle. It seems that this "commission" accepts the premise that in order to solve this energy issue it is needful to support the motor vehicle and not to address the overarching issue of public versus personal transportation within the context of urban design. So be it, but you might entertain the idea in theory at least, that a true solution to these issues would be to alter the urban paradigm to not be as needful of personal motor vehicles within the urban border. A city designed without them would be more spacious in many ways, certainly less "jammed", and definitely cleaner. Think about it.

    However, even if this were addressed, one would need; A) the motors for mass transit systems, and B) the motors for transport connecting urban zones (and rural folks to the rest of the world). So even if we take the majority of personal motor vehicles out of the equation, we are left with "some." However, under the "new urban design" scenario, the large majority of transportation could be shifted to "track-based" (light surface rail, Segways, bikes, air- or electric carts for short distance...subways, elevated trains for longer shots and for transport of goods.) Thus electricity could be tilted to serving a much larger population. However, this would leave open the question, could we make enough electricity. I should think the energy saved from personal vehicles would be more than enough.

    As to the rest of folks that do need personal motor vehicles, and/or the scenario that presumes their needfulness, let us address the various technologies. First amongst these, we will posit that the idea of "hybrids", meaning a technology that captures otherwise wasted kinetic or potential energy, significantly improves energy efficiency and should become the "status quo" in any case - bar none. (And contrary to what the big automakers would have you think, hybrid technology has been known since the late 1970s / early 1980s. Only now have they bought into the idea however.) The current hybrid technology can easily achieve 70+mpg [see: http://www.hybrid-vehicles.net/DaimlerChrysler-ESX3-hybrid.htm ]

    Direct electric vehicles.

    Pros: no per se pollution. That is, no gasses emitted from the vehicles. With present battery technology, power and range are not an issue - it can be (and in fact HAS been) done. Per mile operating cost is associated with cost of electric power.

    Cons: Batteries are expensive. Current electrical infrastructure does not have sufficient power capacity. No "quick fueling" stations ...

    Solution Summary

    Discussion on alternative automotive fuel technologies - pros and cons, and urban/societal ramifications.

    $2.19