Explore BrainMass


This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Are the concepts of fairness and honor interchangeable, do they have distinct properties or isn't it just smart and strategic business to exploit a weakness in another competitor individual in an organization?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:25 am ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

Per the Webster dictionary, we find the following definitions for fair and for honor:

Fair: in accordance with rules or standards; without cheating or trying to gain an unjust advantage; treating others so as not to show favor; agreeing with what is thought to be right or acceptable.

Honor: respect to someone who is admired; good reputation; high moral standards of behavior.

With respect to a business situation, then, these would have separated, but related, connotations. That is to say that having honor or high moral standards seems to imply that that person would also be fair in terms of how people are treated, how we conduct our business affairs, and how we treat others (the old saying: "treat others as we would have others treat us" would seem to have merit). The honorable person would make every attempt to insure that each business transaction would have a win/win result; that is, both sides to the transaction would come ...

Solution Summary

The expert discusses the differences and similarities between being fair and being honorable in a business setting

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Ethics on Courage, Honor, Trustfulness

Choose three virtues (e.g., justice, fairness, integrity, courage, honor, truthfulness, etc.), and define each using a reputable online dictionary (e.g., http://www.merriam-webster.com/).
Using a section heading for discussion of each of your chosen virtues, discuss how each virtue applies to some ethical issue raised by the Mattel case. For example, you might describe how the virtue you have selected might have been used to more appropriately guide the actions, behaviors, and/or policies of the company (e.g., you may choose to discuss the company's working conditions, worker safety, company fairness, or Mattel's attitudes towards the environment).
Be sure to use at least two sources from the library to support your discussion and analysis (choose sources that are not included in the Background section of Module 2).
Follow The Student Guide to Writing a High Quality Academic Paper guide.
Don't forget to properly cite your sources - both in-text and as end references!
You are expected to demonstrate evidence of critical thinking - as defined in the background materials of Module 2 and the grading rubric.
Be sure to organize your Module 2 Case using the Module 2 Case Format document

View Full Posting Details