Explore BrainMass
Share

Context Diagram vs. Case Diagram

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Compare and contrast a context diagram (using data flow diagram (DFD) modeling) and a use case diagram (using unified modeling language (UML))?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 7:16 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/management-information-systems/context-diagram-vs-case-diagram-497922

Solution Preview

Use case diagram using UML is used in Object oriented design and analysis whereas context diagram using DFD are used in structured analysis and design. Use case diagram using UML provide a much more detailed view of the system as compared to a DFD.

Use case diagrams try to solve a number of problems at the same time which is much more complex as ...

Solution Summary

Compares context diagram and use case diagram.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Analyze the use of the Sekaran diagram on the research process

See attached case file.

The assignments on research you have completed so far have taken you through a step-by-step process on how to develop and design formal research. In this capstone assignment, you will use all the knowledge and skills you have developed over the past weeks and apply it to a published research as part of a group activity.

This assignment consists of a fully APA Style 6th edition formatted paper in which the group analyzes a recently published business research study (a group choice) selected from the academic literature. The group analysis should be framed against each and every one of the steps presented in the Sekaran & Bougie (2010) research process and founded on the skills developed in previous assignments of this course.

Click here to view the Sekaran diagram on the research process.

The analysis itself should be a comparative assessment of how well the author (or authors) of the selected research have fulfilled (or not) each of the steps and sub-steps presented in figure 4.1 of the textbook (please note: it is highly recommended to review Chapters 4 through 6 in the Sekaran book for a refresher on the earlier research processes that have been covered in this course). The focus of the analysis should be on the research process, not as much on the research content itself. Be careful not to paraphrase what the author(s) has already stated in the published research. Again the analysis should be on assessing the adherence to the research process. Look at not only each step (and sub steps) but also how each step serves as a "stepping stone" for the next step. The interrelationships among the steps are also relevant to the analysis.

View Full Posting Details