Situational Leadership II (SLII) is the most comprehensive, up-to-date, and practical method of effectively managing and developing people, time, and resources in the world. SLII provides leaders with a model and the tools for creating open communication and developing self-reliance in those they manage. It is designed to increase the frequency and quality of conversations about performance and development. As a result, competence is developed, commitment is gained, and talented individuals are retained. SLII is recognized as both a business language and a framework for employee development because it works across cultural, linguistic, and geographical barriers. The foundation lies in teaching leaders to diagnose the needs of an individual or a team and then use the appropriate leadership style to respond to the needs of the person and the situation.
Based on the Situational Approach, answer the following questions [200-300 words]. Review Case 5.1; 5.2; and, 5.3 found on pages 110-114 Leadership pdf.
(1) Does a leader's motivation for adapting his or her leadership style have any effect on followers?
(2) Would a leader with a high concern for task differ from a leader with a high concern for relationships?
A leader's motivation for adapting his or her leadership style has a tremendous effect on followers, due to the fact that the followers or his or her subordinates, should be the primary motivation for the leader adapting his or her style. Due to the fact that good leaders adapt their styles based on the characteristics of the followers, as well as the internal and external environmental variables affecting their followers, when a leader adapts his or her leadership style ...
Imagine that you are on a spelunking expedition. You have entered a cave and traveled deeper into the caverns for several hours.
Imagine that you are on a spelunking expedition. You have entered a cave and traveled deeper into the caverns for several hours. The group has entered a small room with only one entrance, the one used to enter the cavern. The entire group except for the leader has entered. As the leader crawls through the entrance, a cave-in occurs. The way out is blocked by her body, which is covered with tons of rubble. She is alive, determined by a pulse in her wrist, which is sticking out of the rubble. It isn't possible to assess the degree of injury (for example, broken neck, internal injuries, and so forth) and moving her may cause more serious injury or death. Time passes, and no help has arrived. Further, the air in the small room is getting stale, and there is less oxygen to breathe. Would you remove her body, by any means possible, and, in the process, sacrifice her life in order to exit the cavern? Would you decide not to do anything to cause further injury or possibly death? What is the rationale for both responses? Integrate the reasons with the means versus the ends arguments that support the following theories (Abrams, 1989).View Full Posting Details