5.1 An experienced senior auditor was assigned to investigate a possible fraudulent situation characterized by extremely high, unexplained merchandise shortages at one location of the company's department store chain. During the course of the investigation, the auditor determined the following:
a. The supervisor of the receiving department was the owner And operator of a small boutique carrying many of the same labels a the chain store. The chain store's general manager was unaware of the ownership interest.
b. The receiving supervisor signed receiving reports showing that the total quantity shipped by a supplier had been received. A total of 5% to 10% of each shipment was diverted to the boutique.
c. The chain's buyers were unaware of the short shipments because the receiving supervisor would enter the correct quantity on the move ticket accompanying the merchandise to the sales areas.
d. The chain's accounts payable department paid vendors for the total quantity shown o the receiving report.
e. Based on the supervisor's instructions, quantities on the move tickets were not compared with those on the receiving report.
Classify each of the five situations as a fraudulent act, an indicator of fraud, or an event unrelated to the investigation. Justify your answers.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 5:44 am ad1c9bdddf
a. The supervisor of the receiving department was the owner and operator of a small boutique carrying many of the same labels as the chain store. The chain store's general manager was unaware of the ownership interest.
This is an indicator of fraud because it provides motivation for the employee. Had the information been known, the employee should probably have had some other position in the company. This is a good example of why general employee work and personal histories, as well as credit checks, can be important.
Had the information been known in the interview stage, the person should not have been hired for a position that invited fraud.
b. The receiving supervisor ...
The 448 word solution carefully explains the classification of each statement with reasons and examples.
SOX: Accuracy of Financial Statements
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) signed into law in July 2002 was intended to improve the accuracy of the financial statements prepared by publicly held companies. Carefully read the summary of this Act.
QUESTION: If you believe that legislation can guarantee the accuracy of public company financial statements, explain why previous laws have failed. If you believe that the reverse is true, please explain why CEOs and CFOs are paying so much attention to this law.
The response should be about 3 pages (double spaced, font size 12, times new roman)
Helpful information provided as attachments.View Full Posting Details