Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Compare and contrast methods of job evaluations

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Compare and contrast the following methods of job evaluations and include examples that are not the same as in the textbook to demonstrate understanding: Lott, Benge and Multiple Regression. Identify the key differences.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com June 4, 2020, 12:00 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/business/business-management/compare-contrast-methods-job-evaluations-313375

    Solution Preview

    Let's take a closer look at the three models, which you can draw on for your for final essay.

    RESPONSE:

    Different models of job evaluations identified different compensable factors is to be able to measure job differences (and job worth) in job rates of pay. Compensable factors are paid-for, measurable qualities, features, requirements, or constructs that are common to many different kinds of jobs. .In fact, to foster the measurement process, pioneers in the development of compensable factors like Lott and Benge developed rating scales. Looking at the methods of Lott, Benge, and Multiple Regressions will identify the difference between the three methods of job evaluations. (http://cc.ysu.edu/~mnwebb/staffing/compensable_factors.pdf).

    In Lott's Point Method, for example, Lott recognized 15 ...

    Solution Summary

    The solution compares and contrasts methods of job evaluations.

    $2.19

    ADVERTISEMENT