Purchase Solution

Parol Evidence Rule Jenkins v. Eckerd

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Jenkins v. Eckerd Corporation questions:
1. After reading the case, explain the Parole Evidence Rule.
2. Have you ever been the victim of a parole evidence rule violation?
3. Do you agree with the parole evidence rule? Explain.

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

Jenkins v. Eckerd Corporation questions:
1. After reading the case, explain the Parole Evidence Rule.
2. Have you ever been the victim of a parole evidence rule violation?
3. Do you agree with the parole evidence rule? Explain.

212 words

Solution Preview

1) The Parol Evidence rule says that any oral or written terms outside of a valid contract are not admissible in a court of law pertaining to that contract. Therefore, written contracts need to have all the terms of the contract written into the contract and no other terms are given ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Situational Leadership

This quiz will help you better understand Situational Leadership and its theories.

Social Media: Pinterest

This quiz introduces basic concepts of Pinterest social media

Basic Social Media Concepts

The quiz will test your knowledge on basic social media concepts.

Introduction to Finance

This quiz test introductory finance topics.

Cost Concepts: Analyzing Costs in Managerial Accounting

This quiz gives students the opportunity to assess their knowledge of cost concepts used in managerial accounting such as opportunity costs, marginal costs, relevant costs and the benefits and relationships that derive from them.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Parol Evidence Rule

    184286 Parol Evidence Rule Parol Evidence Rule says that if a written contract is a complete and final statement of the parties' agreement, any prior or comtemporaneous oral or written statements that alter, contradict, or are in addition to the terms

  • Service Contracts - Parol Evidence Rule and Ethics

    Under the parol evidence rule, pre-contract statements made in these circumstances are effectively unenforceable. How can a business effectively and ethically use standardized form contracts and the parol evidence rule.

  • Grocery's Business: Warranties

    Anything outside of a written contract is parol evidence, whether it is testimony about what was said during contract negotiations, proposals or letters memorializing conversations.The parol evidence rule states that parol evidence is not admissible to

  • Unconscionability in the context of contracts

    For your second question, parol evidence refers to B: evidence outside the four corners of the contract. Parties to a contract cannot introduce parol evidence to prove their case in most jurisdictions under the "parol evidence rule."

  • The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a unified set of statu

    The parol evidence rule provides that oral statements made before signing a written contract may always be used in court to change or contradict the terms of the written contract.

  • signs a written consulting

    b. the extension is enforceble because of the part performance exception c. the extension is enforceable because the period of extension was less than 1 year d. the extension is unenforceable due to the parol evidence rule The parol evidence rules says

  • Business Law question

    modify the terms of the contract When parol evidence does not change the essence of the contract it can be admitted. Parol evidence is inadmissible to contradict the terms of partially integrated written agreement.

  • Guidelines for the courts to allow admission evidence

    parol evidence rule of contract law, which prohibits the admission of extrinsic evidence of the contents of a written contract.

  • Business Law: Major Media Station

    Step 2 Parol evidence rule is a common law rule in contract cases that disallows a party to a written contract from presenting extrinsic evidence that contradicts or adds to the written terms of the contract.

View More Related Solutions