Share
Explore BrainMass

Employment Law Case Analysis - Wright vs. Beverely

I need help with this case analysis:

Wright v. Beverly Fabrics,95 Cal. App. 4th 346(2002),review denied,2002 Cal. LEXIS 3206.

The response should be in two paragraphs: one in which you discuss what you think the court should decide based on your understanding of the law, and a second in which you discuss what the court did decide. When you look up the case online, the easiest way is to type the individual plaintiff and defendant names without the "v" between. For each of the individual paragraphs of the answer, use the IRAC writing format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) to help you develop a good legal analysis.Italicize the plaintiff and defendant names in the text of your answer and in the reference.

Solution Preview

Step 1

Wright v. Beverly Fabrics,95 Cal. App. 4th 346(2002),review denied,2002 Cal. LEXIS 3206.

According to me, the issue is: should helping holding up a collapsing shelf when an employee was not on duty within the course of employment? The rule is that voluntary participation in an off-duty social activity not relating to work-related activities is not within the course of employment. The holding up ...

Solution Summary

This posting gives you a step-by-step explanation of when a claim of negligence can be brought against the employer. The response also contains the sources used.

$2.19