Explore BrainMass
Share

Business Law Case Analysis

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Case One: Mary Stokes is in need of a kidney transplant, and her parents and siblings have been tested for compatibility. Her father is afraid of operations and knows that kidney trouble runs in the family. Before the test, Mary's father tells the doctor that he does not want anyone, especially his wife, to know that he is compatible. He explains that if the family knows they will pressure him into being a donor. The father turns out to be the only one who is compatible. Mary asks the doctor, "Are you sure no one in my family is compatible?"

Is the father a patient and protected by confidentiality? Even if he is not a patient, is his explicit request, which was not refused, a protection of his confidentiality? If the matter is confidential, what can the physician say or do to protect the secret?

Case Two: Dr. Curious has a habit of wandering around the hospital and looking at the records of friends who are in the hospital. The nurses have tried to stop him, but he has retaliated by making their lives miserable and belittling them in public at every opportunity. The nursing administration has been notified, but has done nothing, as it wants to avoid rocking the boat.

What are the nurses' ethical obligations after they have done everything mentioned in the text?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:23 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/business-law/business-law-case-analysis-572221

Solution Preview

Dear Student,

The content below has been written to get you started on this assignment. This has been written to help you with this particular problem and its use is limited as such. The content of the solution must not therefore be passed on as your own work for grading or commercial purposes. You can also use the listed resources to explore your topic further.

Hope that this helps!

Solution:
Case 1
In the given case, the father is a patient because he is afraid of operations and mentally not ready for kidney donation. According to donor selection criteria, a living kidney donor must be absolutely healthy both physically and mentality. The father of Mary is physically fit and compatible to donate his kidney, but he is not mentally ready for donation due to his fear of pneumonia or infection from operations that can be considered as psychological illness. This particular information about the father is protected by confidentiality or not it depends on doctor because this is a general disease that occupies in most of the human beings. According to legal and ethical obligations of medical profession, there is no restriction for not disclosing this type of psychological problem of a person with others (UC Davis, 2015).

If the father is not a patient and matched all criteria to become a living kidney donor, but at the same time, he is requested to doctor for not disclosing to his family members that he is compatible to donate kidney then it will be an ethical responsibility of doctor to maintain confidentiality of ...

Solution Summary

This solution discusses the confidentiality issue and nurses' ethical obligations in the two given situations.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Effective Commincation Case Study Analysis

Select one of the following case studies:

The selected is The Katrina Kalamity, Ch. 13, which is attached in a PDF file.

-Write a case study analysis in which you evaluate the effectiveness of communication between an organization and its publics.

*Evaluate the effectiveness of the communication between the organization and its intended public(s) in the case study, including the following:

*Identify the different publics involved in the case study. Differentiate between the internal and external publics involved. What impact did the communications have on the intended public(s)? Could the message have been communicated more effectively? How?

*Identify the different PR communication tools and techniques that were used to inform, influence, and motivate the public(s) in the case. Evaluate the benefits and risks of using these tools. What other tools would you have used?

*If this crisis were to occur today, how would new technologies, such as the Internet, affect this case? Because of the recent globalization of markets, would the outcome of this case be different if the events occurred today?

-Format according to APA standards & provide all references used.

Thanks

View Full Posting Details