Explore BrainMass
Share

Accountants' Weak Ethical Reasoning

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Does Selection-Socialization Help to Explain Accountants' Weak Ethical Reasoning?
Journal of Business Ethics 42: 71-81, 2003.
2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
by
Mohammad J. Abdolmohammadi
William J. Read
D. Paul Scarbrough

Read the attached article and provide feedback on the following questions:

1. Explain the purpose of the article and the research method used

2. Explain the major conclusions of the article

3. What is your opinion on these conclusions?

4. Do you think selection socialization exists in public accounting?

5. Do you think accountants have certain characteristics, as indicated in the article? Why or why not?

6. If you agree, what encourages these characteristics?

7. Can that be changed? Should it be changed?

8. If you agree with the article, how can public accounting firms benefit from these findings? If you disagree with the article, what are the implications for public accounting and accounting education?

9. What is your alternative explanation of these findings?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 3:06 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/business-ethics/accountants-weak-ethical-reasoning-409219

Attachments

Solution Preview

1. Explain the purpose of the article and the research method used
The purpose of the article is point out that a disproportionately high level of Sensing/Thinking cognitive style accountants is hired. This is the result of selection-socialization effect. The Sensing/Thinking cognitive style is associated with low levels of ethical reasoning. So, accounting firms should consider recruiting cognitive styles associated with higher levels of ethical reasoning. The research method uses was that of survey research in which responses of 91 accountants from the big five accounting firms were surveyed. The instruments used were Rest's Defining Issues Test and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
2. Explain the major conclusions of the article
The major conclusions of the article are that 46 percent recruits into Big-five accounting firms have the Sensing/Thinking cognitive style. This cognitive style leads to relatively low level of cognitive reasoning. Further, the study shows that women recruited into public accounting do not exhibit higher levels of moral reasoning than do men. Also, group decision making in accounting has resulted in insignificant differences between men and women. The Sensing/Thinking cognitive style is ...

Solution Summary

Accountants' Weak Ethical Reasoning is discussed in great detail in this solution.

$2.19
Similar Posting

Questions for accounting

1. What do you understand by acting in the public interest?
2. Select the FOUR factors below which distinguish a profession from an occupation
A. Qualification required
B. Highly skilled
C. Continuing professional development
D. Self-regulation
E. Highly valuated services
F. Training requirement
G. Licensed practice
H. Ethical codes of conduct
3. What do you understand by money laundering?
4. Which THREE of the following are usually identified as the main prerequisites of fraud?
A. Motivation
B. Dishonesty
C. Immaturity
D. Poverty
E. Iniquity
F. Opportunity
5. What do you understand by the term insider-trading?
6. The following are three arguments explaining why insider trading is wrong and in many countries illegal. Rank the strength of each argument on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is a very weak argument and 5 is a very strong argument.
A. Allowing insider trading is unfair to those who cannot use sensitive information for their own financial advantage.
B. Allowing insider trading can damage the trust that investors have in capital markets and may put people off investing.
C. Allowing insider trading makes markets potentially more volatile and riskier than they would otherwise be if no such practice took place.
7. Why are professional ethics important?
8. In the following three situations identify, in each case, which fundamental principles are involved.
(i) A bookkeeper was rushing to complete a piece of work for an important deadline, which her manager had insisted must be met without fail. After she completed the work she carried out certain checks herself, but serious accounting errors were not detected, and there was no time for someone else to check her work.
Which ONE of the following fundamental principles is involved?
a. Integrity
b. Objectivity
c. Professional competence and due care
d. Confidentiality
e. Professional behaviour
(ii) (ii) A former longstanding client of an accounting practice is being investigated by the tax authorities. The former client requests the assistance of the practice in representing them in the case being brought. In doing so, the client promises to pay a substantial fee for such assistance and guaranteeing to re-appoint the practice as their accountants in the future.
Which TWO of the following fundamental principles is involved?
a. Integrity
b. Objectivity
c. Professional competence and due care
d. Confidentiality
e. Professional behavior

(iii) Accountant X who runs an accounting practice completes the tax returns for a number of key clients. One of the clients, A, who pays substantial fees to the practice has earned a taxable profit significantly lower than in the previous year. A had not supplied the usual set of bank statements, but did include a full record of all sales and expense receipts.

The following day X completed, checked and submitted the tax return on the basis of the figures and documentation received, without having requested the missing set of bank statements from the client or involving another colleague in the work.
Which ONE of the following fundamental principles are involved?

a. Integrity
b. Objectivity
c. Professional competence and due care
d. Confidentiality
e. Professional behavior
9. What do you understand by the term personal effectiveness?

View Full Posting Details